The conversation also explores the purpose behind Astronauts for America, an initiative shaped by former astronauts concerned about the country’s growing distance from constitutional principles and civil discourse. For Charlie, the question of America’s future ultimately comes down to something deeply human: whether people from different backgrounds and circumstances can still recognize one another as part of a shared national story.

In this special live interview, recorded at the United States Naval Academy Alumni Association, John R. Miles sits down with Charlie to explore the experiences that shaped his understanding of service, leadership, and America’s future.

We are grateful to the U.S. Naval Academy Alumni Association for welcoming us and making the filming of this conversation possible.

A Life of Service: From the Jim Crow South to NASA Leadership

Charlie Bolden’s understanding of service began long before he entered the military. His parents were educators, and his father and three maternal uncles served together in a segregated Army unit during World War II. They returned to a country that still imposed profound restrictions on Black Americans, yet the example they left their children was rooted in responsibility, perseverance, and a commitment to doing something for others. Charlie grew up understanding that the opportunities available to him had been shaped by people who had served before him, often under circumstances that made those opportunities difficult to imagine.

His own path took him to the Naval Academy, the Marine Corps, and eventually the astronaut corps. He became a combat pilot and test pilot before flying four Space Shuttle missions, experiences that demanded technical discipline, sound judgment, and trust in the people responsible for each mission. When he later became NASA Administrator, he carried a principle from his military career into civilian leadership: take care of your people. He understood that organizations perform at their best when leaders recognize the knowledge, judgment, and contributions of the people doing the work.

That principle also shaped how he thought about his responsibilities as NASA Administrator. Charlie describes his role as a government employee whose job was to help bring people together, including members of Congress, the White House, and the professionals working throughout the agency. His account offers a useful perspective on leadership and public service: authority may give someone responsibility for a decision, but meaningful progress depends on the ability to listen, understand competing priorities, and create the conditions for people to work toward a common purpose.

The Overview Effect: What Seeing Earth From Space Teaches Us About Humanity

The overview effect is often described as a shift in perspective experienced by astronauts when they see Earth from space. Charlie had lived that experience before his son introduced him to the term. During his missions, he watched the planet pass beneath the Space Shuttle, completing an orbit roughly every 90 minutes. From daylight, he could see the atmosphere’s thin blue glow and the immense beauty of the planet, but individual people, buildings, and vehicles were largely invisible. Even major cities appeared as indistinct shapes on the surface.

That distance changed the scale of what seemed important. The conflicts, frustrations, and divisions that occupy so much human attention become difficult to distinguish from orbit. What remains visible is a remarkably beautiful and fragile planet, sustained by an atmosphere that is far thinner than its appearance from the ground might suggest. Charlie recalls thinking about how easily humanity could damage the very environment on which its survival depends. The experience led him to question why people struggle so much to cooperate when their lives ultimately depend on the same world.

His reflections on the overview effect connect naturally to another experience from his career: his work with international leaders and space agencies while serving as NASA Administrator. He and his team visited 52 countries during the Obama administration, meeting with national leaders and representatives of their space programs. Those encounters reinforced his awareness of how much responsibility the United States carries in the eyes of people around the world. He often spoke about the idea of America as a shining city on a hill, while recognizing that the country must continually work to live up to the ideals others associate with it.

The perspective gained from space also helps explain why international cooperation became so important to Charlie. On one of his final Shuttle missions, he flew with Russian cosmonaut Sergey Krikalev. Charlie had grown up during the Cold War, when the Soviet Union was understood as an adversary, and initially struggled with the idea of sharing a mission with someone from the other side of that divide.

An opportunity to spend time with Sergey and his family changed the relationship. Their conversations about their children and the future revealed the shared concerns beneath the political identities they had inherited. The two became close friends, and their experience became a personal example of what cooperation can make possible when people begin by recognizing one another’s humanity.

In this episode, you’ll learn

• How Major General Charles Bolden’s childhood in the Jim Crow South and his family’s legacy of military service shaped his understanding of the American dream and the responsibility to serve others.
• What the overview effect reveals about Earth’s fragility, humanity’s shared future, and the importance of seeing beyond the divisions that dominate everyday life.
• How a personal relationship with Russian cosmonaut Sergey Krikalev challenged Charlie’s inherited assumptions about an adversary and demonstrated the human potential of international cooperation.
• Why Charlie and other former astronauts became involved with Astronauts for America, and how constitutional literacy, civic education, and public participation support democratic institutions.
• What Charlie learned about leadership at NASA, including the importance of listening to overlooked expertise, recognizing people’s contributions, and creating room for different perspectives.
• Why inclusion and belonging matter to America’s future, and how finding common ground can help people work together across deep disagreements.

Leadership Means Listening, Finding Common Ground, and Making Room for Expertise

Charlie’s years at NASA gave him a close view of how institutions respond to change. When he became Administrator, he was responsible for navigating an agency with a deep history, established practices, and people who had spent decades developing their expertise. He understood that change could create tension between established ways of working and new possibilities, particularly when safety and public trust were involved. His approach was to focus on the people who understood the work and to recognize that a leader’s effectiveness depends partly on knowing where expertise resides.

He illustrates this through the story of Katherine Johnson, the mathematician whose calculations helped NASA understand the mathematics required for early human spaceflight. Charlie recalls how she studied the problem of transitioning from Earth orbit to lunar orbit, reviewed the relevant mathematical work, and eventually brought her insight to a group of engineers who had been struggling with the challenge. Her contribution also reveals something about the culture surrounding expertise: a Black woman had to establish credibility in an environment where her knowledge was not automatically recognized. For Charlie, the story reinforces the importance of listening carefully enough to recognize valuable ideas, especially when they come from people an organization has historically overlooked.

His approach to collaboration also extends beyond the workplace. Charlie describes advising Marines and NASA colleagues to seek out someone with whom they strongly disagree and invite that person to have a conversation. He recommends acknowledging the disagreement openly, recognizing that both people have a responsibility to accomplish something together, and looking for one small point of agreement from which they can begin working outward. The process requires patience and a willingness to understand what the other person values, but it can create a foundation for solving problems that neither side could address alone.

This philosophy informed his efforts to encourage cooperation with China in space exploration. Charlie describes a trip undertaken with NASA colleagues to examine whether collaboration might be possible, guided by reciprocity, mutual benefit, transparency, and mutual respect. He was interested in understanding how the United States and China could work together on practical issues, including the compatibility of spacecraft and the possibility of helping one another in an emergency. He makes clear that the goal was not to bring China into the International Space Station program, but to explore ways to cooperate where shared safety and future exploration made it worthwhile. His account illustrates how collaboration can begin with practical responsibilities, even when broader political disagreements remain unresolved.

The Conversation Behind Astronauts for America: Why Service Extends Beyond the Uniform

During the interview, Charlie explains that his work with Astronauts for America grew from concerns shared by astronauts about the country’s relationship with its founding principles. They had spent their careers working within institutions that depended on discipline, trust, evidence, and a clear sense of responsibility. Over time, they became increasingly concerned about declining respect for the Constitution, the rule of law, civil discourse, and decisions grounded in science and reliable information.

For Charlie, these concerns are connected to the purpose of public service. The Constitution establishes principles and protections that belong to the country as a whole, and preserving them requires citizens who understand their rights and responsibilities. His perspective is shaped by a lifetime in organizations where people from different backgrounds must depend on one another to accomplish difficult things. He believes that the ability to disagree while remaining committed to shared principles is essential to the country’s future.

One of the most important parts of this work is helping younger generations understand their place in American civic life. Charlie and John discuss how little many people know about the institutions that govern them, how laws are made, or how citizens can participate in the process. Civic responsibility becomes difficult to exercise when people do not understand how their government works or believe their involvement will make a difference. Education, constitutional literacy, and participation therefore become essential parts of sustaining a healthy democracy.

The invitation to participate is deliberately broader than the astronaut community itself. John closes the interview by pointing out that people do not need to have flown in space to become team members of Astronauts for America. He shares that he joined because he believes in the organization’s purpose. That moment brings the conversation back to a central idea running throughout Charlie’s career: service is defined by what people are willing to contribute, and there are meaningful ways to serve long after a uniform comes off.

Inclusion and Belonging: What America’s Future Requires From All of Us

Near the end of the conversation, John introduces his work on the science of mattering and asks Charlie what message he would offer young people who struggle to feel significant or included. Charlie’s response centers on belonging. He argues that inclusion is essential because people need to feel that they have a place in the society they help sustain. His answer also broadens the discussion beyond young people, pointing out that families and communities across the country can experience exclusion in different ways. He specifically mentions American farmers who may feel left out of the country’s changing economic and social landscape.

For Charlie, the American dream depends on whether people from different circumstances can see a future for themselves within the same national story. He recalls the experiences of astronauts whose journeys began far from the institutions they eventually joined, including José Hernández, who grew up working in the agricultural fields of California before becoming an astronaut. These stories illustrate how talent and determination can emerge from circumstances that are easy for others to overlook. They also raise a larger question about the country: how many people might contribute something meaningful if they had a genuine opportunity to participate?

His reflections on inclusion return to the history he described at the beginning of the interview. Growing up in the Jim Crow South gave him a personal understanding of how laws and institutions can determine who is allowed to participate fully in society. He connects that history to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, while emphasizing that each generation inherits responsibilities that remain unfinished. A society’s principles become meaningful through the decisions people make to extend opportunity, protect rights, and ensure that others can participate in the life of the country.

The conversation ends with Charlie returning to the challenge of finding common ground. He believes people must be willing to sit with those whose political or social views differ sharply from their own and begin with the principles they may still share. That approach requires more than civility as a social convention; it requires an understanding that a country cannot sustain a common future if its people lose the ability to recognize one another as fellow citizens. His message is ultimately about the work of building a society in which more people can see themselves as included in its promise.

SPONSORED DEALS

FODZYME

We’re so excited to partner with FODZYME and offer you 30% off your first order when you go to I Can Eat Again dot com slash PASSIONSTRUCK.

SHOPIFY

It’s time to turn those “What Ifs” into SFX: CHA-CHING with Shopify today. Sign up for your one-dollar-per-month trial today at SHOPIFY DOT COM SLASH passionstruck.

Vinted

Ready to clean out your closet and make some extra money? Download the Vinted app for free and start listing. With no seller fees, you keep every dollar you earn.

About Today’s Guest, Charles Bolden

Major General Charles “Charlie” Bolden Jr. is a former NASA Administrator, retired United States Marine Corps Major General, combat pilot, and astronaut who flew four Space Shuttle missions. A graduate of the United States Naval Academy, Bolden built a distinguished career spanning military aviation, human spaceflight, and public service. He served as NASA Administrator from 2009 to 2017, leading the agency during a significant period of transition that included the growth of commercial spaceflight and continued international cooperation in human space exploration.

Raised in Columbia, South Carolina, during the Jim Crow era, Bolden’s life has been shaped by a family tradition of education, perseverance, and service. His experiences as an astronaut gave him a distinctive perspective on humanity’s relationship with Earth, while his years in military and civilian leadership strengthened his commitment to teamwork, institutional responsibility, and collaboration across differences. Through his involvement with Astronauts for America, he continues to emphasize constitutional principles, civic participation, and the importance of ensuring that more Americans feel included in the country’s future.

Ex-NASA Chief Charles Bolden: The Space Lesson That Could Save Our Divide

Learn More and Connect

👉 All episode links, my books You Matter, Luma, and The Mattering Effect, The Ignited Life newsletter, and the Start Mattering store are here: linktr.ee/John_R_Miles

FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions)

Who is Major General Charles Bolden?

Major General Charles “Charlie” Bolden Jr. is a former NASA Administrator, Marine Corps Major General, combat pilot, and NASA astronaut who flew four Space Shuttle missions. He served as NASA Administrator from 2009 to 2017. His career has included military service, human spaceflight, public leadership, and work focused on civic responsibility and international cooperation.

What is the overview effect, and how did Charles Bolden experience it?

The overview effect describes a shift in perspective that some astronauts experience when they see Earth from space. Charlie describes looking down at the planet and recognizing its beauty, the thinness of its atmosphere, and the inability to distinguish individual people or the conflicts that occupy their attention on the ground. The experience led him to reflect on humanity’s shared dependence on Earth and the importance of protecting the environment that sustains life.

What is Astronauts for America?

Astronauts for America is an initiative discussed by Charlie Bolden and other former astronauts who are concerned about respect for the Constitution, the rule of law, civil discourse, and evidence-based decision-making. In the interview, Charlie describes its purpose in terms of supporting constitutional principles, encouraging civic responsibility, and helping younger generations understand their role in American democracy. He emphasizes that people do not need to be astronauts to participate.

What did Charles Bolden learn from flying with Russian cosmonaut Sergey Krikalev?

Charlie initially approached the prospect of flying with a Russian cosmonaut through the lens of the Cold War, when the Soviet Union had been presented as an adversary. Spending time with Sergey Krikalev and his family changed that perspective. Conversations about their children and their hopes for the future revealed how much they shared as people. Their professional partnership developed into a close friendship and became an example of how personal relationships can create the trust needed for international cooperation.

What leadership lessons did Charles Bolden take from his time at NASA?

Charlie emphasizes the importance of taking care of people, listening to those with relevant expertise, and creating opportunities for different perspectives to contribute. He uses Katherine Johnson’s work as an example of why leaders must recognize talent even when it comes from people whose contributions have historically been overlooked. He also believes that difficult disagreements can become productive when people identify a shared objective and begin with a point of common ground.

Why does Charles Bolden believe inclusion and belonging are important to America’s future?

Charlie sees inclusion as essential to whether people believe they have a meaningful place in American society. He discusses young people, marginalized families, and farmers who may feel excluded from the country’s broader promise. His point is that the American dream depends on people having a genuine opportunity to participate, contribute, and pursue a decent life. Belonging is therefore both a personal experience and a civic responsibility.

Meanwhile, many thoughtful people move through their days working, caring for their families, maintaining relationships, and fulfilling responsibilities while quietly wondering whether their contributions are significant enough to matter. In this special solo episode of Passion Struck, I explore how to find purpose without a passion, discover what matters to you, and build a meaningful life through everyday contribution, human connection, and intentional choices.

This conversation began with a question from a listener named Phil Corigliano, who wanted an episode specifically for the average person searching for meaning. He wondered how someone without a clearly defined passion, a special talent, or an obvious calling could identify their place in the world and develop a genuine sense of mattering. His question stayed with me because it exposes something our culture rarely acknowledges: millions of people are trying to understand their significance while measuring themselves against standards of achievement that were never designed to describe the full range of human value.

I believe we need a more grounded understanding of purpose, one that recognizes the importance of ordinary lives and the contributions that often remain invisible. A meaningful life can emerge through the people we support, the problems we care enough to address, and the responsibilities we choose to embrace. It can begin with something as simple as noticing that another person needs help and deciding to stay.

Why We Confuse an Extraordinary Life With a Meaningful One

Our culture has become remarkably skilled at celebrating visible achievement. We admire founders who build billion-dollar companies, athletes who break records, artists who transform their industries, and leaders whose accomplishments become part of history. There is genuine value in recognizing exceptional work, but somewhere along the way, we began treating exceptional achievement as the primary evidence that a person’s life matters.

In my book, The Mattering Effect, I describe this tendency through the idea of the marketplace of mattering, where people come to believe their worth must continually be earned through productivity, recognition, and visible accomplishments. The result is a persistent form of comparison. We begin evaluating our lives against people whose circumstances, abilities, opportunities, and ambitions may have very little in common with our own. When our contributions seem modest by comparison, we can start overlooking the significance of what we already bring to the world.

I think an old-growth forest offers a useful way to understand this problem. When we stand beneath its canopy, our attention naturally moves toward the tallest redwoods and the enormous trees that dominate the landscape. Yet beneath the ground exists an intricate network of fungal threads called mycelium, connecting roots, supporting the ecosystem, and helping sustain the forest’s resilience. The visible trees may capture our attention, but the unseen network plays an equally essential role in keeping the entire system alive.

Human communities work in much the same way. The neighbor who checks on someone living alone, the colleague who brings calm to a stressful workplace, the parent who creates emotional safety for a child, and the friend who remembers to reach out during a difficult season all contribute to something larger than themselves. Their influence rarely produces public recognition, yet their presence can fundamentally shape another person’s experience of life. When we begin to recognize these contributions, we develop a more complete understanding of what makes a life meaningful.

What Nicholas Winton Teaches Us About Finding Purpose Through Ordinary Actions

One of the stories I share in this episode is that of Nicholas Winton, a British stockbroker clerk whose actions during the months preceding World War II helped save 669 children from Nazi-occupied Czechoslovakia. In December 1938, Winton was preparing for a ski holiday when a friend asked him to travel to Prague instead. What he encountered there changed the direction of his life. Refugee camps were filled with families who had fled the Nazi takeover of the Sudetenland, and children were living in extraordinarily difficult conditions.

Winton responded with the tools he had available. He established a makeshift office, recorded children’s names, contacted authorities, raised funds, arranged foster placements, and worked through the bureaucracy required to organize their evacuation. During the day, he continued his regular brokerage work. In the evenings, he typed letters, coordinated arrangements, and followed through on the countless administrative details that made the rescue possible. Eight trains eventually carried 669 children to safety.

For decades, Winton rarely discussed what he had done. His wife discovered a scrapbook containing the children’s names and records in their attic in 1988, and his story eventually became public through a BBC television program. During the broadcast, people in the audience who owed their lives to his efforts stood up around him.

What stays with me about this story is the relationship between ordinary ability and extraordinary consequence. Winton’s contribution grew from administrative discipline, persistence, and an ability to recognize a human need that demanded attention. He did not begin with a grand declaration about his destiny. He encountered a situation that mattered and decided to take responsibility for what he could do.

Most of us will never encounter a crisis of that magnitude, but the underlying pattern is remarkably relevant to everyday life. Meaning can emerge when we recognize a responsibility, invest in a relationship, or become consistently present for someone who needs support. Sometimes, the work that gives our lives significance begins with an opportunity that looks ordinary from the outside.

In this episode, You’ll Learn:

• Why our culture’s emphasis on extraordinary achievement can make ordinary people overlook the meaning and significance already present in their lives.
• What Nicholas Winton’s story reveals about how everyday skills, persistence, and responding to human needs can create an extraordinary contribution.
• How to use The Three Clues to discover what matters to you by examining what you find hard to ignore, where your presence helps, and what you are willing to take responsibility for.
• Why purpose can emerge through participation, relationships, and consistent contribution rather than through a single moment of self-discovery.
• How to develop a sense of mattering that extends beyond professional achievements, institutional recognition, and external validation.
• How to begin discovering a more meaningful direction through seven days of reflection and one intentional action within forty-eight hours.

The Three Clues to Discovering What Matters to You

One reason people struggle with finding purpose is that much of the advice encourages them to begin by looking inward. They are told to identify their greatest strengths, uncover their authentic passion, or take personality assessments until a clear direction emerges. Those exercises can be useful, but they can also become frustrating when someone looks inside and finds no obvious answer.

I suggest approaching the question from another direction. Instead of concentrating exclusively on what you think your purpose should be, pay attention to how you respond to the world around you. Your attention, relationships, and willingness to accept responsibility can reveal important information about what matters to you.

I call this framework The Three Clues.

1. What do you find hard to ignore?

Pay attention to the situations that consistently interrupt your indifference. Perhaps you notice an older neighbor becoming isolated, a child being discouraged from believing in their abilities, or someone in your workplace being treated as though their contribution has little value. These moments can reveal the concerns that resonate most deeply with you.

Your personal history often influences what you notice. Experiences of being overlooked, misunderstood, supported, or encouraged can shape your sensitivity to similar experiences in other people. Someone who remembers what it felt like to stand alone in a room may become particularly attentive to those who feel excluded. Your history hasn’t decided your destiny, but it has trained your eye.

2. Where does your presence help?

Think about the people who have made the greatest difference in your life. Consider what made their presence meaningful. Perhaps they listened carefully when you were struggling, offered reassurance during a difficult transition, or created an environment where you felt safe enough to make mistakes and grow.

Now consider where you bring that kind of value to others. You might be someone who brings order to complicated situations, helps outsiders feel welcome, remains calm when others are overwhelmed, or consistently handles the responsibilities that keep a family or team functioning. These contributions may not appear extraordinary on a résumé, but they can be indispensable to the people who experience them.

3. What are you willing to take responsibility for?

The third clue moves from observation toward commitment. You may discover what matters through the process of becoming involved in something beyond yourself. Imagine volunteering at a local food pantry or helping children with their studies. At first, you might simply be curious or looking for a constructive way to spend your time. Then you begin recognizing familiar faces, learning people’s stories, and understanding the challenges they encounter. Eventually, the success of that community becomes personally important to you.

Your sense of purpose can develop through that participation. You become invested because you have relationships, responsibilities, and experiences that connect you to something meaningful.

I also think about a conversation I had with Andreas Widmer, author of The Pope and the CEO. Andreas once explained that we impoverish the idea of entrepreneurship when we reduce it to starting a company. At its core, entrepreneurship involves creating something of value by asking a fundamental question: How may I help you? That question captures an important part of discovering purpose because it moves us from endless self-examination toward meaningful engagement with the world.

The Mattering Effect: Why Feeling Valued and Adding Value Changes How We Live

The ideas in this episode connect closely to the central argument of my book, The Mattering Effect: Creating a Life of Meaning and Worth. I define mattering as a two-way relationship between feeling valued and adding value. Both experiences are important because human significance develops through the relationship between how we experience our own worth and how we contribute to the lives of others.

We often confuse mattering with admiration, status, or recognition. Yet those experiences can be temporary and dependent on circumstances outside our control. A professional title may disappear when a career changes. An institution may stop providing the identity and community that once gave our work meaning. Recognition may shift toward someone else. When our sense of worth depends entirely on these external structures, transitions can leave us questioning who we are.

I experienced this during my own transition out of the U.S. Navy. After leaving military service, I had accepted an appointment with the FBI at Quantico, but Congress failed to pass the budget, and my entire class was recycled. The career transition I had built my plans around disappeared almost overnight, and I eventually took a position at Booz Allen Hamilton. Although I was working alongside people with military backgrounds, the organizational culture felt very different from the collective mission and brotherhood I had experienced in the Navy. The emphasis had shifted toward billable hours, profit margins, and corporate deliverables.

That period forced me to confront a question I had previously been able to avoid: Who was I when the uniform came off, and the institution that had helped define my identity was no longer there to validate me?

Looking back, I recognize how important that experience was in understanding the relationship between identity, purpose, and mattering. Professional achievement can provide direction, community, and a sense of contribution, but a person’s significance must extend beyond the structures that recognize their work. It also lives in their values, relationships, decisions, and capacity to make another person’s experience better.

This is why I believe the question we should carry with us is: Who experiences something better because I am in their life? It shifts our attention toward the human consequences of our choices and helps us recognize that a meaningful life is often built through relationships and contributions that never appear in a performance review or public biography.

The Mattering Effect by John R. Miles as a Must Read by the Next Big Idea Book Club (image)

How to Start Finding Meaning in Your Everyday Life: A Practical Exercise

Understanding the relationship between purpose and mattering becomes more useful when we translate it into something we can practice. I recommend approaching the next seven days as an opportunity to observe your own life with greater attention. Rather than attempting to define your entire future, use The Three Clues to identify where meaning may already be emerging.

Start by keeping a short daily record of the moments that stand out to you. Notice the problems that capture your attention, the situations where someone benefits from your presence, and the responsibilities you feel willing to accept. You may begin recognizing patterns that were previously easy to overlook.

As you reflect, consider these practical steps:

• Pay attention to what moves you: Identify one situation, problem, or human need that you find difficult to ignore. Explore why it captures your attention and what your response reveals about your values.
• Recognize where you already contribute: Ask a few people who know you well when they experience your presence as particularly helpful. Their observations may reveal strengths and contributions you have come to take for granted.
• Look for a responsibility you can embrace: Identify a person, community, or problem where a small but consistent contribution could make a difference.
• Experiment with something new: Borrow an idea from Jon Acuff, whom I interviewed in Episode 839. He calls it auditioning a goal: choose something new, give it fifteen minutes a day for seven days, and observe what you learn from the experience.
• Take one small action within forty-eight hours: Call a relative who has become isolated, help an overwhelmed colleague work through a challenge, or volunteer a few hours in your community. Choose an action that connects your observations to something real.

At the end of the week, look back at what you noticed and what you actually did. Consider which experiences generated a deeper sense of connection, which responsibilities felt worth continuing, and where your contribution seemed to matter to someone else. You may begin to recognize a direction that was difficult to identify when you were trying to solve the question of purpose entirely in your head.

The larger lesson is that a meaningful life develops through participation. We discover what matters by becoming involved with people, problems, and responsibilities that deserve our attention. Over time, these commitments can become part of how we understand ourselves and the contribution we want to make.

A Final Reflection

I want to return to the question Phil asked at the beginning of this conversation: How does someone without a clearly defined passion, a special talent, or an obvious calling begin to discover what matters to them?

I think the answer becomes clearer when we stop treating purpose as a destination that must be identified before life can begin to feel meaningful. Purpose can take shape through the people we love, the work we approach with care, the responsibilities we accept, and the moments when we recognize that someone else’s circumstances might improve because we chose to be present.

You may spend your life doing work that never attracts public recognition, supporting people whose names will never appear in a newspaper, or contributing to communities whose strength depends on countless individual acts of care. Those experiences still carry significance. They are part of the relationships and connections that make human life possible.

You do not have to become extraordinary to matter. You can begin by paying attention, recognizing where your presence helps, and deciding what you are willing to take responsibility for.

You matter. And your life is still becoming.

SPONSORED DEALS

FODZYME: We’re so excited to partner with FODZYME and offer you 30% off your first order when you go to I Can Eat Again dot com slash PASSIONSTRUCK.

Shopify: Sign up for your one-dollar-per-month trial today at SHOPIFY DOT COM SLASH passionstruck.

About the Author

I’m the author of Passion Struck, winner of the Gold Stevie® Award for Best Business Book and a Next Big Idea Club Must-Read, and the host of the Passion Struck podcast, with more than 85 million downloads.

As a former Fortune 50 executive and U.S. Navy officer, I’ve spent more than two decades synthesizing insights from psychology, neuroscience, behavioral science, leadership, and human flourishing to understand why so many people quietly lose their sense of significance despite outward success.

My work has been featured in Fortune, Inc., Forbes, ABC, NBC, Fox, and Writer’s Digest, and I’ve appeared on leading podcasts including 10% Happier with Dan Harris, The Next Big Idea Daily, and FranklinCovey On Leadership.

Feeling Lost in Life? Here’s How to Find What Matters | John R. Miles

Frequently Asked Questions

How do you find meaning in life when you don’t have a calling?

Finding meaning in life begins with paying attention to the people, problems, and experiences that create a sense of responsibility within you. You might not have a clearly defined passion or a career that feels like your calling, but you can still discover what matters through everyday interactions and contributions. Start by noticing what you find difficult to ignore, where your presence makes a difference, and what you are willing to take responsibility for. Purpose often develops through participation and relationships, gradually becoming clearer as you engage with the world around you.

Can you live a meaningful life without discovering your passion?

Yes. A meaningful life can develop through relationships, personal commitments, meaningful work, and the contributions you make to other people’s lives. Passion is one possible source of direction, but it is not the only way to experience purpose. You might find deep fulfillment in raising a family, supporting a colleague, helping your community, or consistently showing up for someone who needs you. These experiences demonstrate that human significance is often built through ordinary actions that create lasting value for others.

What are the three clues to discovering your purpose?

In Passion Struck Episode 843, John R. Miles introduces The Three Clues, a practical framework for identifying what matters to you. The first is asking what you find hard to ignore, which helps reveal the problems and human needs that capture your attention. The second is considering where your presence helps, allowing you to recognize the contributions you already make in your relationships and everyday environments. The third is identifying what you are willing to take responsibility for, because purpose can develop through consistent involvement in something beyond yourself. John recommends observing these three clues over seven days and taking one meaningful action within forty-eight hours.

What is the difference between finding your purpose and discovering your mattering?

Purpose provides direction by helping you understand what you want to contribute to or accomplish through your life. Mattering addresses a deeper question: whether you feel valued and recognize that you add value to the lives of others. In The Mattering Effect, John R. Miles describes mattering as a two-way relationship between feeling valued and adding value. This distinction is important because your sense of significance can remain connected to your relationships, values, and contributions even as your career, circumstances, and ambitions change.

How can ordinary people make a meaningful contribution to the world?

Ordinary people contribute to the world through the ways they support others, strengthen relationships, and respond to everyday needs. A person who checks on an isolated neighbor, helps an overwhelmed colleague, creates a welcoming environment, or makes a child feel emotionally safe can have a profound influence on someone else’s life. Nicholas Winton’s story illustrates how ordinary abilities and consistent follow-through can produce extraordinary consequences. His work reminds us that meaningful contributions often begin with recognizing a need and deciding to take responsibility for what we can do.

Why do people feel lost when they cannot identify their calling?

Many people feel lost because they have learned to associate purpose with a singular passion, exceptional talent, or clearly defined professional destination. When those things remain difficult to identify, they may interpret the uncertainty as evidence that something important is missing from their lives. This expectation can also make everyday contributions seem insignificant when compared with highly visible achievements. Looking beyond career aspirations and paying attention to relationships, responsibilities, and the problems that matter to you can provide a more grounded way to begin discovering direction.

How does your personal history influence what matters to you?

Your personal history can shape the experiences, problems, and human needs you notice most readily. Someone who remembers feeling overlooked may become especially attentive to people who are excluded, while someone who experienced encouragement during a difficult period may place particular importance on helping others recognize their potential. These experiences can reveal patterns in what you care about and where you feel compelled to contribute. As John explains in this episode, your history hasn’t decided your destiny, but it has trained your eye.

Can you find purpose without changing your career?

Absolutely. Discovering purpose does not necessarily require leaving your job, starting a business, or pursuing an entirely different professional path. You can find meaning in the way you approach your existing responsibilities, support your colleagues, develop relationships, and contribute to your community. Sometimes, a greater sense of purpose emerges when you recognize the value of work you already do and become more intentional about the people who benefit from your presence.

How do you find meaning after losing a professional identity or important role?

Losing a professional identity can create a difficult period of uncertainty, particularly when a career or institution has provided much of your sense of belonging and significance. Rebuilding meaning involves reconnecting with the values, relationships, and contributions that extend beyond that role. In this episode, John shares how an unexpected disruption to his post-Navy career plans forced him to reconsider who he was without the uniform and institutional validation. His experience illustrates why a lasting sense of mattering needs foundations that remain meaningful through professional and personal transitions.

What is one practical way to start living a more meaningful life today?

Start by choosing one small action that responds to something you genuinely care about. You might call someone who has become isolated, help a colleague navigate a difficult situation, or volunteer your time to support a local community. John recommends spending seven days observing The Three Clues and taking one action within forty-eight hours. The purpose of this exercise is to turn reflection into participation, allowing you to discover what matters through real experiences rather than waiting until you have a complete understanding of your life’s direction.

In this episode of Passion Struck, John R. Miles speaks with Carleigh Bodrug, founder of PlantYou and bestselling cookbook author, about making healthier eating more practical, accessible, and sustainable. Their conversation explores why time often matters more than motivation, how small changes can reshape our relationship with food, and why a thoughtful approach to meal planning can make a meaningful difference.

Why Healthy Eating Becomes Difficult When You’re Busy

One of the most revealing ideas in Carleigh Bodrug’s approach to food is her observation that people often have a time problem rather than a motivation problem. Many people already know what a balanced meal might look like. They understand that cooking at home, incorporating more vegetables, and paying attention to fibre can support their well-being. The difficulty comes when those intentions meet the practical demands of work, family, caregiving, and the exhaustion that accumulates throughout the day.

Carleigh describes how a lack of time can create a recurring cycle. When people are tired, ordering takeout or choosing a prepared meal can feel like the only manageable option. That decision may offer immediate relief, but when meals consistently become rushed and less nourishing, people can find themselves feeling less energetic and even less prepared to cook the following day. The pattern becomes self-reinforcing, with each busy evening making the next one harder to navigate.

Her own experience helped her recognize the importance of designing food around the realities of people’s lives. As her business grew and she became a mother, the hours she once had available for elaborate cooking became increasingly limited. That shift influenced the way she developed recipes, placing greater emphasis on short preparation times, simple ingredients, and meals that could realistically fit into a busy household.

This perspective changes the question we ask ourselves about eating well. Rather than relying on an idealized version of ourselves with unlimited time and energy, we can begin by examining the conditions under which our decisions actually happen. A healthy routine becomes more achievable when it is designed for the life we have, including the demanding days when convenience matters most.

How to Build Healthy Eating Habits That Last

Carleigh’s philosophy of sustainable eating begins with a simple principle: meaningful change is often built through adjustments that are small enough to repeat. She has seen how the pursuit of perfection can make people approach food with an intensity that becomes difficult to maintain. Someone might decide to transform their entire diet overnight, eliminate several familiar foods, and adopt an entirely new routine. The initial enthusiasm can be powerful, but the number of changes involved may create more friction than the person can realistically manage.

A more sustainable approach begins with one decision that can become part of an ordinary day. Carleigh suggests making room for more vegetables on the plate, adding a whole grain to a familiar meal, or trying a plant-based milk in a morning coffee. These adjustments allow people to experiment with new choices while preserving the foods and routines they already enjoy. Over time, repeated decisions can gradually change what feels familiar and natural.

This is also where the psychology of behavior change becomes important. Habits become easier to maintain when the effort required to perform them is manageable and the environment supports the desired action. A meal that takes a few minutes to prepare is more likely to become part of a busy evening than an elaborate recipe that requires extensive shopping and preparation. A familiar rotation of meals can reduce decision fatigue, while ingredients that are already available at home can make cooking feel less demanding.

Carleigh also discusses what happens when people fall out of their routines. Travel, holidays, family responsibilities, and unexpected changes can interrupt even well-established habits. The important moment comes when the disruption ends. Treating a missed week as a reason to abandon the routine can extend a temporary interruption into a much longer pattern. Returning to familiar meals and manageable choices helps restore momentum.

Her perspective offers a more realistic understanding of consistency. Healthy eating habits develop through repetition, adaptation, and the willingness to begin again. The goal is to build a relationship with food that can withstand the ordinary unpredictability of life.

In this episode, you’ll learn

• Why Carleigh believes time is often the biggest barrier to healthy eating, and how exhaustion can create a cycle that makes nourishing meals harder to prepare.
• How small, sustainable changes can help people develop healthy eating habits without making perfection the condition for progress.
• How the “Got This, Make That” method and SOS Suppers can simplify meal planning, reduce food waste, and make everyday meals more practical.
• Why fibre and plant diversity deserve attention, including accessible ways to incorporate beans, berries, seeds, vegetables, and other plant foods.
• How Carleigh developed PlantYou Quickies around the needs of busy people, with quick recipes, visual guides, and a plant point system.
• Why returning to familiar routines after a disruption is an important part of building lasting habits.

Simple Meal Planning Strategies for Busy People

One of Carleigh’s most practical recommendations is to begin meal planning by looking at what is already in the refrigerator and pantry. Her “Got This, Make That” approach addresses two problems at once: the difficulty of deciding what to cook and the amount of food that households purchase without eventually using. Instead of beginning with a shopping list, she encourages people to take inventory of what they already have and build meals around those ingredients.

The idea is especially useful because food waste often begins before anyone starts cooking. People go to the grocery store without checking what remains at home, purchase ingredients they already own, and make plans that do not reflect the time they will actually have during the week. A few days later, fresh produce may be forgotten in the refrigerator while the household turns to easier alternatives. Planning around existing ingredients can help reduce unnecessary spending while making meals more intentional.

Carleigh recommends writing a simple weekly plan based on the reality of the season of life a person is experiencing. That might mean outlining a few breakfasts, lunches, and dinners on a piece of paper, identifying meals that can be prepared quickly, and creating a grocery list from what is missing. The plan does not need to be elaborate. Its value comes from reducing the number of decisions that must be made when people are already tired or pressed for time.

She also introduces the idea of SOS Suppers, which stands for “Save Our Sanity.” These meals recognize that convenience foods are sometimes part of everyday life and that a practical approach to eating should account for them. A boxed macaroni and cheese can become more substantial with peas or kale. Frozen pizza can be complemented with artichokes or roasted peppers. A taco kit can be adapted with crumbled tofu. The intention is to make an accessible meal more nourishing without turning dinner into another complicated responsibility.

Carleigh’s approach to meal planning also includes developing a rotation of familiar recipes that household members enjoy. Once a few dependable meals become part of the weekly routine, cooking requires less deliberation. When eating out, she suggests looking for simple ways to make choices that include vegetables and asking for dressings or sauces on the side when appropriate. These decisions make it possible to maintain a sense of direction without expecting every meal to follow an exact plan.

The larger lesson is that meal planning works best when it reduces friction. A useful system should save time, make better use of ingredients, and leave enough flexibility for the unexpected. When the structure supports everyday life rather than competing with it, eating well becomes easier to sustain.

How PlantYou Quickies Makes Healthy Eating More Practical

When Carleigh began developing PlantYou Quickies: 140+ Nourishing Plant-Based Recipes for Busy People, she was responding to a challenge she had come to understand personally and through her community: people wanted to eat well, but they needed recipes that respected the limited time available to them. The cookbook reflects that practical need through quick preparation, one-pan meals, dump-and-bake recipes, and dishes designed to make plant-based cooking approachable.

One of the details Carleigh highlights is the book’s visual format. Ingredients appear at the top of each recipe, followed by an image of the finished dish. The arrangement gives readers a straightforward way to understand what they need and what they are working toward, reducing some of the uncertainty that can make cooking feel intimidating. She also describes how recipes were tested and timed to stay faithful to the promise of quick preparation.

The book includes another feature that connects convenience with nutritional variety: a plant point counter. Inspired by the conversation around plant diversity and gut health, the system helps readers notice the different plants included in their meals. Carleigh explains that plants can include beans, seeds, and spices as well as vegetables and fruit, making diversity more accessible than the phrase “eat 30 plants a week” might initially suggest.

What makes PlantYou Quickies particularly relevant to this conversation is the philosophy behind it. Carleigh wants people to use the recipes, adapt them, and bring more plants into their everyday meals. Her audience includes many people who do not identify as vegan, and she sees that as an opportunity to make plant-forward cooking accessible to a wider community. The book is ultimately an invitation to make nourishing food fit into real schedules, familiar kitchens, and the imperfect rhythms of family life.

Why Fibre and Plant Diversity Matter for Gut Health

A central part of Carleigh’s message is the importance of paying attention to fibre. She points out that fibre is found in plant foods and that many people fall short of recommended intake. During the conversation, she discusses how fibre supports digestion and contributes to the environment of the gut microbiome. For her, helping people incorporate more fibre is one of the most practical ways to encourage a more varied, plant-rich diet.

Her suggestions are refreshingly accessible. Berries can be added to breakfast, hemp hearts and seeds can be incorporated into familiar meals, and sweet potatoes and beans can become regular ingredients. These foods do not require a complete change in cooking style. They can be introduced into meals people already know how to prepare, making the transition easier to maintain.

Carleigh also discusses psyllium husk as a particularly fibre-rich ingredient and describes how she has used it in recipes. Her broader point is that people can increase fibre through a range of foods and ingredients rather than relying on a single solution. Individual nutritional needs vary, so changes to fibre intake should be approached in a way that is appropriate to a person’s health and circumstances.

The conversation then moves from fibre quantity to plant diversity. Carleigh explains the idea of consuming a wider variety of plants throughout the week, including vegetables, fruit, beans, seeds, and spices. She references research suggesting that eating around 30 different plants weekly is associated with a more diverse gut microbiome. The number can sound demanding until we understand that diversity is accumulated across ingredients and meals. A handful of different seeds, beans in a soup, herbs in a dressing, and vegetables in a dinner can all contribute to a broader range of plant foods.

This is one reason the plant point system in PlantYou Quickies is useful. It gives readers a way to notice variety rather than focusing exclusively on individual ingredients or isolated meals. A recipe becomes an opportunity to introduce several different plants at once, and a collection of familiar recipes can gradually expand the range of foods someone eats.

The deeper implication is that variety can become a practical habit when it is built into the way we shop, cook, and plan. Instead of treating plant diversity as another demanding nutritional target, people can approach it as a gradual exploration of ingredients and flavors. Over time, that curiosity can make everyday meals more interesting while helping people pay closer attention to what they eat.

SPONSORED DEALS

FODZYME

We’re so excited to partner with FODZYME and offer you 30% off your first order when you go to I Can Eat Again dot com slash PASSIONSTRUCK.

SHOPIFY

It’s time to turn those “What Ifs” into SFX: CHA-CHING with Shopify today. Sign up for your one-dollar-per-month trial today at SHOPIFY DOT COM SLASH passionstruck.

Vinted

Ready to clean out your closet and make some extra money? Download the Vinted app for free and start listing. With no seller fees, you keep every dollar you earn.

About Today’s Guest, Carleigh Bodrug

Carleigh Bodrug is the founder of PlantYou, a leading plant-based food platform, and a New York Times bestselling cookbook author known for making plant-forward cooking practical, approachable, and accessible. Her work reaches a global community through recipes, videos, and resources that help people bring more plants into their everyday meals.

Carleigh’s interest in food and nutrition became deeply personal when her father was diagnosed with stage two colon cancer while she was 11 years old. Years later, while working as a radio host in Northern Ontario, she encountered news about the classification of red and processed meat as carcinogens. That prompted her to investigate plant-based eating and begin teaching herself how to cook in her small apartment kitchen. With a background in journalism, she started sharing what she was learning online, gradually building the platform that became PlantYou.

Her work is guided by an emphasis on accessibility rather than dietary perfection. Through her cookbooks and digital community, she shows people how to make plant-based meals approachable, reduce food waste, and incorporate more variety into their diets. Her books include PlantYou, Scrappy Cooking, and PlantYou Quickies: 140+ Nourishing Plant-Based Recipes for Busy People. Her recipes and expertise have also been featured on Good Morning America, The Rachael Ray Show, Business Insider, and Martha Stewart Living.

Carleigh’s approach reflects a belief that everyday food choices should work within the realities of people’s lives. Whether she is sharing a quick dinner, helping someone use ingredients already in their kitchen, or encouraging readers to explore more plant foods, her goal is to make eating well feel possible in an ordinary home.

Why You Can’t Stick to a Healthy Diet (It’s Not YOUR Fault) | Carleigh Bodrug

Learn More and Connect

👉 All episode links, my books You Matter, Luma, and The Mattering Effect, The Ignited Life newsletter, and the Start Mattering store are here: linktr.ee/John_R_Miles

FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions)

How can I eat healthy when I’m busy?

Start by choosing meals that fit the time and energy you actually have. Keep a small rotation of familiar recipes, use ingredients already available in your kitchen, and look for meals that require minimal preparation. Carleigh Bodrug’s approach emphasizes practical options such as one-pan dishes, simple meal planning, and SOS Suppers that make convenient foods more nourishing. A realistic routine is easier to maintain than a complicated plan that demands more time than your schedule allows.

What are the easiest healthy eating habits to start with?

Small changes can make a useful starting point. Add vegetables or beans to a familiar meal, include berries or seeds in breakfast, or replace part of a meal with vegetables and whole grains. Carleigh encourages people to experiment with manageable adjustments rather than attempting to change their entire diet at once. The most useful starting point is a habit that feels achievable enough to repeat.

How do I build healthy eating habits that last?

Build routines around actions you can repeat in your current circumstances. Plan a few meals each week, keep ingredients for dependable recipes on hand, and make changes gradually. It also helps to recognize that routines will sometimes be interrupted. Returning to familiar habits after travel, illness, or a particularly busy period is part of maintaining long-term consistency.

How can I eat healthier without following a strict diet?

Focus on the overall pattern of your meals rather than trying to control every individual choice. You can incorporate more vegetables, beans, whole grains, fruit, and other plant foods while continuing to enjoy familiar meals. Carleigh’s philosophy is centered on making plant-forward eating accessible, including for people who do not follow a vegan diet. Flexibility can help make healthier choices more compatible with social occasions, family preferences, and everyday schedules.

What is the easiest way to meal prep for a busy week?

Begin by checking your refrigerator and pantry, then create a simple plan based on the ingredients you already have. Choose a few meals you know how to prepare and identify small tasks that can be completed in advance, such as preparing a dressing, cooking quinoa, or slicing vegetables. You can also develop a rotation of dependable family meals so that every evening does not require a new recipe or a fresh set of decisions.

How can I get more fibre in my diet?

Include more fibre-rich plant foods in meals and snacks. Carleigh mentions berries, hemp hearts, seeds, sweet potatoes, and beans as accessible options. You can add them to foods you already enjoy rather than redesigning your entire diet. If you have a digestive condition or specific medical needs, consult a qualified healthcare professional before making substantial dietary changes.

Why is fibre important for gut health?

Fibre supports digestive function and helps nourish beneficial gut bacteria. It is found in plant foods such as beans, fruit, vegetables, seeds, and whole grains. Increasing the variety of these foods can also help broaden the range of plants in your diet. Individual needs differ, but fibre is an important part of the conversation about digestive health and everyday nutrition.

How many different plants should I eat each week?

Carleigh discusses the idea of eating around 30 different plants each week, a target associated with research on gut microbiome diversity. The count can include more than vegetables: beans, seeds, fruit, herbs, and spices can all contribute. Thinking about variety across the entire week makes the goal feel more manageable than trying to include a large number of different plants in every meal.

What are SOS Suppers?

SOS Suppers means “Save Our Sanity.” Carleigh uses the term for practical meals that make convenient foods more nourishing with simple additions. Examples from the conversation include adding peas or kale to boxed macaroni and cheese, topping frozen pizza with vegetables, or using crumbled tofu in a taco kit. The idea is to make dinner workable during demanding moments while still finding opportunities to include more plants.

How can I reduce food waste while meal planning?

Before shopping, check what is already in your refrigerator, freezer, and pantry. Build your meal plan around ingredients that need to be used, then purchase only what is needed to complete those meals. Carleigh’s “Got This, Make That” approach helps people turn existing ingredients into meal ideas and avoid buying more food before using what they already have.

How do I get back to healthy eating after falling off track?

Return to one or two familiar habits rather than trying to compensate with an ambitious new plan. Prepare a simple meal, restock a few useful ingredients, or return to a recipe that has worked well in the past. Carleigh and John discuss how a disrupted routine can become a longer cycle when people interpret a temporary lapse as a reason to give up. Re-establishing momentum through manageable actions is often the most useful next step.

In this episode of Passion Struck, John R. Miles sits down with registered dietitian nutritionist Lee Cotton to explore the connection between food, self-worth, body image, and emotional well-being. Drawing on her clinical experience and her own history with disordered eating, Lee offers a thoughtful perspective on how our earliest experiences shape our habits and how a more attentive relationship with our bodies can support healthier choices throughout life.

Their conversation moves beyond familiar nutrition advice to examine the psychology of eating: why childhood food rules can follow us into adulthood, how social expectations influence body image, why food sometimes becomes a source of comfort or control, and what it means to approach nourishment with greater awareness and compassion.

How Your Relationship With Food Reflects Your Sense of Self-Worth

For many people, the experience of eating carries an emotional significance that extends far beyond taste or nutritional value. A number on the scale, the decision to order dessert, or the feeling of having eaten more than intended can become evidence in an internal judgment about personal discipline, attractiveness, or worth. As Lee explains, this connection often develops gradually, especially in a culture that sends conflicting messages about what bodies should look like and what it means to be healthy.

Lee’s own journey into nutrition began with her personal struggles around food. After initially pursuing a career in public relations, she changed direction in her mid-30s and became a dietitian, bringing her lived experience into a profession centered on helping others. That background informs the way she approaches the subject: food choices can become entangled with the desire to be accepted, the fear of judgment, and the belief that changing our appearance might change how we feel about ourselves.

The conversation reveals why separating nourishment from self-evaluation matters. When eating becomes a measure of personal success or failure, ordinary decisions can carry disproportionate emotional weight. Rebuilding a healthier relationship with food involves recognizing that the need to nourish ourselves is part of being human, and that our worth cannot be measured by our appearance, weight, or ability to follow a particular set of food rules.

The Childhood Food Rules That Continue to Shape Adult Eating Habits

Our earliest experiences with food often become the foundation for habits we carry long after childhood. Lee recalls growing up with the familiar instruction to join the “clean your plate club,” a message that can teach children to prioritize finishing a meal over recognizing whether they are still hungry. In other families, food may be associated with praise, punishment, comfort, celebration, or expectations about what a good child should eat.

These experiences matter because food is both a biological necessity and a social experience. Meals bring families together, create traditions, and become part of the memories through which we understand belonging. At the same time, the language used around the table can influence how children interpret their appetites and bodies. Lee explains that conversations between parents and adolescents can have consequences that continue into adulthood, particularly when eating becomes associated with guilt, shame, or the need to meet someone else’s expectations.

Recognizing these inherited patterns creates an opportunity to reconsider them. A person who learned to ignore hunger, feel guilty about certain foods, or associate eating with approval may eventually discover that these responses have become automatic. Understanding where they came from can make it easier to approach food with curiosity and develop habits that reflect present needs rather than childhood expectations.

In this episode, you’ll learn

• How self-worth and body image can become intertwined with food choices, eating habits, and the number on the scale.
• Why childhood food rules and family conversations can influence the way we eat and think about our bodies well into adulthood.
• How emotional experiences, trauma, and periods of uncertainty can shape our relationship with food and sometimes lead to disordered eating behaviors.
• What mindful eating means in practice and how pausing to recognize hunger, preferences, and nutritional needs can support greater awareness.
• Why nutrition should reflect individual needs and change across different stages of life, including perimenopause and menopause.
• How to approach nourishment with greater self-compassion and recognize that being worthy of care is not something we have to earn.

Emotional Eating, Body Image, and the Psychology Behind Food Choices

The question “What is food to you?” offers a useful starting point for understanding the emotional dimensions of eating. Lee uses this question in her work with women, encouraging them to explore the words and memories they associate with food. For one person, food may represent comfort or happiness; for another, it may bring up anxiety, sadness, restriction, or a sense of losing control. Those associations often have a history, and examining them can reveal experiences that remain influential in the present.

Lee also discusses how periods of uncertainty or major life transitions can affect eating behaviors. During perimenopause and menopause, for example, women may be navigating changes in their bodies alongside shifting family roles, careers, grief, or other personal challenges. In her practice, Lee has observed that some women respond to these experiences by seeking a greater sense of control through food restriction or other disordered eating behaviors.

Trauma can also influence the psychology of eating. Lee shares part of her own story, describing a period in her late teens when she struggled with food and felt that she did not matter. Controlling her food intake became one way of responding to circumstances in which she felt powerless. Her reflection brings the discussion back to a central question: what happens when a person begins to use food to manage feelings that are difficult to express or resolve?

Understanding emotional eating requires sensitivity to individual circumstances. Emotional eating does not automatically indicate an eating disorder, and diagnosed eating disorders require appropriate professional assessment and care. When eating behaviors become distressing, restrictive, or harmful, support from qualified mental health and nutrition professionals can be an important part of recovery.

Mindful Eating Begins With Listening to Your Body

Mindful eating is often discussed as a technique, but Lee describes it as a practice of awareness. She encourages people to pause before a meal and consider how their bodies feel, whether they are hungry, what they are drawn to eating, and what nutritional needs they may have. That moment of attention can interrupt the automatic routines that often shape eating throughout a busy day.

Developing this awareness also means recognizing that nutrition is individual. Lee does not advocate a single eating pattern for everyone. She has explored different approaches throughout her own journey, including Ayurvedic nutrition, raw foods, and plant-based nutrition, and her experience has reinforced the importance of understanding individual needs. As she explains, people respond differently to food, just as they have different preferences and abilities when it comes to physical activity.

This perspective also changes the way we think about food choices. Lee encourages balance and variety rather than creating unnecessary fear around particular ingredients or foods. She discusses the importance of preparation, quantity, and the broader pattern of someone’s diet, while emphasizing that excessive anxiety around eating can become harmful in its own right. Enjoyment belongs in the experience, too. The memories of a grandmother’s cookies, birthday cake, or a shared meal can be meaningful parts of a person’s relationship with food.

Mindful eating ultimately asks us to become more attentive to the signals and experiences that guide our choices. It can involve noticing hunger, recognizing satisfaction, appreciating enjoyment, and understanding how our bodies respond over time. With practice, eating can become a more intentional part of caring for ourselves.

A Nourishing Perspective: Finding a More Compassionate Way to Live With Food

Lee Cotton’s book, A Nourishing Perspective: Reconnect with Your Inner Voice and Harmonize Your Relationship with Food, grew out of a question that has shaped both her personal journey and her professional work: what would change if people understood the emotional meaning of food as deeply as they understood its nutritional value?

During the conversation, Lee explains that she wanted to create a resource that could help women examine the experiences and beliefs influencing their relationship with eating. The book begins with the image of a woman looking in the mirror and questioning her worth, a scene that reflects how easily body image can become intertwined with identity. From there, it explores the ways family messages, cultural expectations, emotional experiences, and different stages of life can shape how people nourish themselves.

One of the book’s central ideas is the importance of reconnecting with an inner voice. Lee describes this as the process of understanding our core values, recognizing our responses to triggers and past experiences, and becoming more aware of the way we interpret the world around us. She also introduces the LOVE framework, which John brings up during the interview as a way of thinking about listening, observing, and embracing a more attentive relationship with ourselves.

The book also brings together practical nutrition education and broader reflections on well-being. Lee discusses nutritional needs across the lifespan, the influence of diet culture, mindful and intuitive eating, and the importance of understanding the individual behind every food choice. Her message is particularly meaningful for readers who have spent years feeling disconnected from their bodies or evaluating themselves through the standards of others.

Ultimately, A Nourishing Perspective invites readers to consider nourishment as an expression of care. Its most resonant idea is one Lee returns to throughout the interview: you are worthy of nourishment, and you matter.

Nourishment Through Every Stage of Life: Women’s Health, Menopause, and Changing Needs

Our nutritional needs and experiences change throughout life, yet many people continue to evaluate their bodies against expectations formed in an earlier stage. Lee discusses how this can become especially difficult during perimenopause and menopause, when hormonal changes may coincide with shifts in sleep, mood, family responsibilities, and body composition. For some women, these transitions can create pressure to restrict food in an attempt to regain a sense of control.

Lee emphasizes the importance of individualized nutrition during this stage of life. In the conversation, she highlights areas such as bone health, essential fatty acids, cardiovascular health, cognition, and sleep as considerations when thinking about nourishment through midlife. She also expresses concern about people who respond to body changes by consistently eating too little, explaining that adequate nourishment remains important as the body changes.

The discussion also touches on gut health and the relationship between digestion and emotional well-being. Lee describes how digestive difficulties and imbalances may be reflected in mood, while noting that the gut can be influenced by factors such as stress, environment, medications, and supplements. She also speaks about the role of modern medicine, including the appropriate use of antibiotics, and returns to the importance of balance.

A central theme runs through these subjects: nutrition should respond to the person, their circumstances, and their stage of life. Lee’s perspective encourages people to approach changing bodies with patience and to seek qualified guidance when medical or nutritional concerns require individual assessment.

SPONSORED DEALS

UNCOMMON GOODS

Discover unique, meaningful holiday gifts from independent artists and small businesses. Get 15% off your next order at uncommongoods.com/passionstruck.

FODZYME

We’re so excited to partner with FODZYME and offer you 30% off your first order when you go to I Can Eat Again dot com slash PASSIONSTRUCK.

SHOPIFY

It’s time to turn those “What Ifs” into SFX: CHA-CHING with Shopify today. Sign up for your one-dollar-per-month trial today at SHOPIFY DOT COM SLASH passionstruck.

About Today’s Guest, Lee Cotton

Lee Cotton, RDN, LDN, is a registered dietitian nutritionist, author, speaker, and founder of Lee Cotton Nutrition, LLC. Her work focuses on helping individuals develop healthier relationships with food through nutrition education, mindful eating, and a deeper understanding of the emotional and behavioral factors that influence eating habits.

With professional experience supporting people navigating disordered eating, women’s wellness, and medical nutrition needs, Lee brings a compassionate, individualized perspective to the connection between food and well-being. She is the author of A Nourishing Perspective: Reconnect with Your Inner Voice and Harmonize Your Relationship with Food, a book that explores body image, self-worth, food psychology, and nourishment across the lifespan.

Through her practice in North Carolina and Florida, Lee advocates for a more thoughtful approach to nutrition, one that recognizes the person behind every food choice and the importance of feeling worthy of care.

Watch the video: The Hidden Reason You Can’t Stop Eating Is Your Self-Worth | Lee Cotton

Learn More and Connect

👉 All episode links, my books You Matter, Luma, and The Mattering Effect, The Ignited Life newsletter, and the Start Mattering store are here: linktr.ee/John_R_Miles

FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions)

How can you rebuild your relationship with food?

Rebuilding your relationship with food begins with understanding the beliefs, emotions, and experiences that influence how you eat. This may involve examining childhood food rules, recognizing feelings of guilt or anxiety, becoming more attentive to hunger and satisfaction, and allowing enjoyment to be part of eating. Lee emphasizes realistic changes, individual needs, and a more compassionate approach to nourishment. When eating behaviors cause significant distress or affect health, working with qualified professionals can provide important support.

What is the difference between emotional eating and an eating disorder?

Emotional eating describes situations in which someone turns to food in response to feelings such as stress, sadness, boredom, or a desire for comfort. An eating disorder is a diagnosable mental health condition with specific clinical criteria and can involve serious physical and psychological consequences. The two concepts should not be treated as interchangeable. As Lee explains in the conversation, eating disorders require appropriate diagnosis and professional care, often involving mental health support alongside nutrition treatment.

How does childhood influence your relationship with food?

Childhood experiences can shape the meanings people attach to eating, hunger, and body image. Messages such as being expected to finish every meal, being praised for eating certain foods, or hearing negative comments about weight can become internal rules that influence adult behavior. Family meals and conversations also help establish emotional associations with food. Becoming aware of these patterns can help people understand their habits and decide which beliefs they want to carry forward.

What is mindful eating?

Mindful eating is the practice of paying attention to the experience of eating and the body’s signals. It can begin with a brief pause before a meal to notice hunger, preferences, and nutritional needs. It also involves being more present while eating and recognizing the role of enjoyment and satisfaction. In Lee’s approach, mindful eating is less about following a rigid method and more about developing awareness of what the individual needs.

How can menopause affect a woman’s relationship with food?

Perimenopause and menopause can bring changes in the body, sleep, mood, and nutritional considerations. These changes may also coincide with significant life transitions, which can influence how some women think about food and body image. Lee has observed restrictive and disordered eating behaviors among some midlife women in her practice. She emphasizes individualized nutrition and the importance of adequate nourishment during this stage of life. Anyone experiencing significant changes or concerns should seek guidance from an appropriately qualified healthcare professional.

Can trauma affect the way someone eats?

Trauma and difficult life experiences can influence how people relate to food, particularly when eating becomes associated with comfort, safety, or a sense of control. Lee shares how her own experiences affected her relationship with food and discusses how similar patterns can appear in clinical practice. These experiences are highly individual, and understanding them may require support from professionals who can address both the emotional and nutritional dimensions of eating.

In this episode of Passion Struck, I explore how to overcome limiting beliefs by understanding where these stories originated, examining the evidence behind them, and reclaiming the ability to choose how we respond.

Through conversations with developmental psychologist Dr. Alexis Redding and author Jon Acuff, I examine the connection between childhood experiences, identity, negative self-talk, and personal agency, and introduce a practical framework called the Tape Check to help you determine which beliefs still serve you and which deserve a closer look.

The Tapes We Inherit and the Stories We Mistake for Truth

In 1979, a research team abandoned a collection of interviews with college students, leaving recordings of young people describing their lives, uncertainties, and hopes tucked away in archives for decades. When Dr. Alexis Redding eventually helped recover those recordings, she and her colleagues expected to hear how different those students were from the young people they encountered in classrooms today. Instead, they heard familiar concerns about loneliness, parental expectations, uncertain careers, and the difficult work of figuring out who they wanted to become. When the former students eventually listened to their younger selves, many recognized how much that perspective might have changed the way they raised their children and grandchildren.

I find that story compelling because it reveals something about the assumptions we carry across generations. The circumstances surrounding our lives evolve, but many of the questions we wrestle with remain remarkably consistent. We want to belong, to feel capable, to make our lives count, and to understand whether we are moving in the right direction. The environments in which we grow up help us interpret those experiences, and the interpretations we absorb can become beliefs about what is possible, what is expected, and what we must do to earn acceptance.

Over time, a message that once reflected a particular circumstance can begin to feel like a permanent truth about who we are. A child who receives praise for being responsible may grow into an adult who struggles to ask for help. Someone who is repeatedly compared with a more outgoing sibling may conclude that leadership belongs to other people. A student who learns that mistakes threaten approval may become an accomplished professional who experiences every challenge as a test of personal worth. Understanding how to overcome limiting beliefs begins with recognizing that these internal narratives have histories, and that understanding their origins gives us a more thoughtful way to evaluate their influence.

How Our Environments Shape Identity and Personal Agency

One of the most important insights I took from my conversation with Alexis is that the stories we tell about younger generations often reveal as much about our own assumptions as they do about the people we are describing. She and her colleague, Dr. Nancy Hill, invited undergraduates to read transcripts from the recovered student interviews and use different highlighter colors to mark passages that felt familiar or unfamiliar. The students marked far more material as familiar than the researchers had anticipated. The exercise made visible the continuity beneath the surface differences between generations.

That continuity matters because the environments we create teach people what to value, which emotions they should conceal, and which forms of achievement will earn recognition. Alexis described the pressure students experience to appear effortlessly successful, a phenomenon sometimes called duck syndrome, in which someone seems to glide smoothly above the water while paddling furiously underneath. When everyone around us appears composed and capable, we can begin to interpret our own uncertainty as evidence that we are falling behind. The resulting perfectionism becomes a way of managing the fear that our struggles might change how others see us.

I have seen versions of this pressure in my own life. When I was around thirty-eight, I compared my progress with that of my Naval Academy classmates, some of whom had achieved extraordinary things in their careers. I found myself measuring my life against their accomplishments, and the comparison created a feeling of being behind even as I continued to build my own path. In my conversation with Jon Acuff, he helped me recognize how familiar that experience is and how easily modern platforms can intensify it by making other people’s milestones constantly visible.

Personal agency begins to grow when we recognize the difference between an experience and the interpretation we have attached to it. We can acknowledge that someone else has achieved something remarkable without turning their accomplishment into a verdict on our own lives. We can recognize the expectations of our environments while examining whether those expectations reflect the values we want to carry forward. That distinction creates room for more deliberate choices and a more accurate understanding of ourselves.

In this episode, You’ll Learn:

• How family, school, and cultural expectations become internal soundtracks that shape identity, behavior, and self-perception.
• What Dr. Alexis Redding’s discovery of archived student interviews reveals about the similarities between generations and the experiences that shape belonging.
• How Jon Acuff’s soundtracks and “signs in your stands” explain the influence of labels and other people’s judgments on our choices.
• How to use the Tape Check’s three questions to identify a limiting belief, trace its origins, and test it against evidence.
• Why small experiments, imperfect action, and the principle that “some beats none” can help us discover possibilities beyond old assumptions.
• How feeling seen, heard, valued, and encouraged connects our personal narratives with the broader question of how we help others know they matter.

The Soundtracks and Labels That Follow Us Into Adulthood

Jon Acuff describes recurring mental narratives as soundtracks, and he uses the image of signs in the stands to explain how other people’s judgments can become part of our internal dialogue. Imagine a stadium filled with people holding signs about what you can and cannot do. One sign says that you are not a natural leader. Another suggests that your family never gets ahead. Another tells you that people like you are not creative, athletic, successful, or capable of taking a particular risk. When a message comes from someone whose opinion matters to us, we may accept it before we have developed the perspective to question it.

Jon shared the example of an executive who continued withdrawing from leadership opportunities despite having the experience to pursue them. The pattern became clearer when he traced it back to an authority figure who had told the executive, at seventeen, that leadership did not come naturally to them. A comment made in one moment had become a reference point for decisions made decades later. Jon also described a mentor’s diagram of increasingly smaller boxes moving down an organizational hierarchy, illustrating how each person can narrow the boundaries they inherited until the person at the bottom has very little room left to explore.

These examples help explain why limiting beliefs can be so persistent. They become woven into the way we predict outcomes, interpret setbacks, and decide which opportunities are worth pursuing. When a belief tells us that effort will lead nowhere, avoiding the effort can appear sensible. When we repeatedly avoid the opportunity, we also lose the chance to discover whether the belief was accurate. The narrative then seems confirmed by an absence of experiences that might have challenged it.

I believe one of the most useful things we can do is become more curious about the messages we carry. A familiar thought deserves examination precisely because it feels so automatic. We can ask whether it came from direct experience, someone else’s judgment, a family expectation, or a comparison that no longer reflects our circumstances. That inquiry allows us to treat our internal dialogue as something we can understand and evaluate, rather than as an unquestionable description of who we are.

The Mattering Effect: How the Stories We Inherit Shape Our Sense of Worth

The questions at the heart of this episode connect closely with the ideas I explore in my book, The Mattering Effect: Creating a Life of Meaning and Worth. Our sense of worth develops partly through the environments we inhabit and the ways other people respond to us. The messages we receive can influence whether we feel recognized, whether we believe our contributions count, and whether we experience belonging as something we can trust. Over time, those experiences can become part of the stories we tell ourselves about who we are and what we must accomplish to matter.

That connection helps explain why the Tape Check is about more than changing an isolated thought. When a person believes they must achieve constantly to deserve recognition, the belief may reflect a history in which achievement became the clearest route to approval. When someone hides uncertainty because they fear losing respect, they may be responding to an environment that rewarded effortless performance and left little room for vulnerability. Understanding those patterns allows us to examine both our internal narratives and the conditions that continue to reinforce them.

The Mattering Effect explores how we learn to measure our worth and how we can create environments in which people feel seen, heard, valued, and encouraged. The same principles apply to the stories we pass between generations, teams, families, and communities. When we recognize how our words and expectations influence another person’s sense of possibility, we gain a greater appreciation for the responsibility that comes with leadership, parenting, teaching, and everyday relationships.

For me, the connection between mattering and agency is especially important. Understanding where a belief came from can help us make a more deliberate choice about whether to carry it forward. Creating environments where others know they matter can also give them greater room to explore, take appropriate risks, and develop a more complete understanding of their own abilities. The work begins with listening carefully to the stories we have inherited and continues through the messages we choose to give ourselves and the people around us.

The Mattering Effect by John R. Miles as a Must Read by the Next Big Idea Book Club (image)

The Tape Check: Three Questions That Help Us Test Our Beliefs

I developed the Tape Check as a practical way to bring these ideas into everyday life. It draws on Alexis’s work recovering the student interviews, Jon’s insights into mental soundtracks, and the example of the Wright brothers, who questioned published aerodynamic measurements when their glider’s performance failed to match the expected results. Rather than simply trying harder with assumptions they had inherited, the brothers built a wind tunnel and tested different wing shapes. Their willingness to examine the evidence helped them move toward a result they could trust.

The same principle can guide the way we approach beliefs about ourselves. A thought may feel convincing because we have repeated it for years, because someone influential first expressed it, or because our environment continues to reinforce it. Familiarity, however, does not establish accuracy. Testing a belief gives us a way to learn from experience rather than allowing an old conclusion to determine what we attempt next.

The Tape Check consists of three questions:

1. What’s playing?

I begin by stating the belief as clearly as possible. It might be “I’m not a natural leader,” “I’m always behind,” or “My generation will never get ahead.” Putting the thought into words helps me recognize the narrative I have been carrying instead of allowing it to operate unnoticed in the background.

2. Whose voice is that, and what year was it recorded?

Next, I examine where the belief originated. Who first communicated it? How old was I? What was happening in that environment, and what behavior did it reward or discourage? A comment from a teacher, parent, manager, or peer may have reflected that person’s limited perspective or the expectations of a particular moment. Understanding the context helps me distinguish what happened then from what remains true today.

3. Does it hold up?

Finally, I look for evidence. If the tape says I am not a natural leader, I can examine the occasions when people trusted my judgment, sought my guidance, or followed my direction. I can identify experiences that support the belief and those that complicate it, then choose a small experiment that will help me learn more. The goal is to develop a more accurate understanding of myself through evidence and action, rather than replacing an old assumption with an equally unsupported slogan.

Practical Ways to Challenge Limiting Beliefs and Create a New Narrative

I encourage you to begin with one belief that repeatedly influences your decisions. Choose something specific enough to examine, especially a thought that appears when you are considering a new opportunity, responding to a setback, or comparing your progress with someone else’s. Write it down in a single sentence and use the Tape Check to explore its origins. The exercise becomes more useful when you approach it with curiosity, allowing yourself to discover what the belief has meant in your life and whether it continues to describe your present circumstances.

Next, design a small experiment that lets you gather new evidence. If you have convinced yourself that you are not creative, spend fifteen minutes a day for seven days working on something that interests you. If you believe you cannot lead, volunteer to coordinate a modest project or help a colleague work through a problem. Jon’s advice is to audition a goal rather than treating every new interest as a permanent commitment. A short experiment can reveal whether an activity energizes you, what you need to learn, and which assumptions were preventing you from trying.

I also find it useful to replace all-or-nothing thinking with a more flexible standard for action. Jon describes this as “some beats none.” If you intended to run three miles but have time for only two, those two miles still count. Applied to personal growth, the principle gives us room to make progress while circumstances remain imperfect. Each small action can produce information, build confidence grounded in experience, and make the next action easier to approach.

Finally, consider the tapes you are recording for other people. Alexis identified four elements that help students experience belonging: feeling seen, heard, valued, and encouraged. A sincere acknowledgment can change the way someone understands their place in a room, while sharing the uncertain and unfinished parts of your own story can help them recognize that struggle is part of development. I want us to leave this episode with two commitments: examine one belief that has been shaping our own lives, and offer someone else a more constructive message through encouragement, attention, or an honest account of what it took to find our way.

Enjoy the Show? Listen to Episode 840

If you’ve ever wondered, “How do I overcome the limiting beliefs that keep shaping my life?”, Episode 840 explores how the stories we inherit from family, school, authority figures, and culture can become internal soundtracks that influence our identity and the choices we make. I share a personal realization from around age thirty-eight, when comparing my progress with my Naval Academy classmates left me feeling behind, even as I continued building my own path. That experience reminded me how easily someone else’s achievements can become the measure we use to judge our own lives, especially when an old belief tells us we’re falling short.

In this episode, I draw on conversations with developmental psychologist Dr. Alexis Redding and author Jon Acuff to explore how the environments we inhabit shape our beliefs, why childhood labels can follow us into adulthood, and how familiar assumptions can quietly limit our sense of possibility. I also introduce the Tape Check, a practical three-question framework to help you identify the story you’re repeating, understand whose voice first recorded it, and test whether it still holds up against evidence. Because the beliefs we inherit can influence the lives we build, understanding where they came from gives us the opportunity to decide what deserves to play next.

Listen to Episode 840 of Passion Struck with me on Spotify, or explore the show on our YouTube channel.

For weekly companion essays, practical toolkits, and interactive reflections, join our community at The Ignited Life on Substack.

SPONSORED DEALS

FODZYME: We’re so excited to partner with FODZYME and offer you 30% off your first order when you go to I Can Eat Again dot com slash PASSIONSTRUCK.

Shopify: Sign up for your one-dollar-per-month trial today at SHOPIFY DOT COM SLASH passionstruck.

About the Author

I’m the author of Passion Struck, winner of the Gold Stevie® Award for Best Business Book and a Next Big Idea Club Must-Read, and the host of the Passion Struck podcast, with more than 85 million downloads.

As a former Fortune 50 executive and U.S. Navy officer, I’ve spent more than two decades synthesizing insights from psychology, neuroscience, behavioral science, leadership, and human flourishing to understand why so many people quietly lose their sense of significance despite outward success.

My work has been featured in Fortune, Inc., Forbes, ABC, NBC, Fox, and Writer’s Digest, and I’ve appeared on leading podcasts including 10% Happier with Dan Harris, The Next Big Idea Daily, and FranklinCovey On Leadership.

You’re Living by Beliefs Someone Else Wrote for YOU | John R. Miles explains

Frequently Asked Questions

What are limiting beliefs?

Limiting beliefs are assumptions about yourself, your abilities, or your future that narrow the possibilities you believe are available to you. They can develop through family expectations, school experiences, feedback from authority figures, and cultural messages. In Episode 840 of Passion Struck, John R. Miles explores how these beliefs can become internal soundtracks that influence identity and behavior long after the circumstances in which they formed have changed.

How do you overcome limiting beliefs?

You can begin overcoming limiting beliefs by identifying the message you repeatedly tell yourself, examining where it originated, and testing whether it accurately reflects your present circumstances. John R. Miles calls this process the Tape Check, a three-question framework that encourages you to name the belief, identify whose voice shaped it, and examine whether it holds up against evidence. Small experiments can help you discover possibilities that an old assumption may have concealed.

How does childhood shape the beliefs we hold as adults?

Childhood experiences can influence how people understand their abilities, relationships, and place in the world. Messages from parents, teachers, peers, and other authority figures can become internalized expectations that continue to shape adult decisions. The episode explores this process through Jon Acuff’s examples of people carrying labels from childhood into adulthood and Dr. Alexis Redding’s research into the similarities between college students across generations.

What is the Tape Check?

The Tape Check is a three-question framework introduced by John R. Miles in Episode 840 of Passion Struck for examining beliefs that may be limiting your choices. The questions are “What’s playing?”, “Whose voice is that, and what year was it recorded?”, and “Does it hold up?” The method combines self-reflection with evidence and small experiments to help you determine whether a familiar belief still deserves your trust.

How do negative beliefs affect your identity?

Repeated negative beliefs can influence identity by shaping which opportunities people pursue, which challenges they avoid, and how they interpret their experiences. In his conversation with Jon Acuff, John R. Miles explores how labels such as “I’m not a natural leader” can become self-imposed boundaries. Examining those labels against real experiences can reveal whether they accurately describe a person’s abilities or simply reflect an earlier judgment.

How can you change your mindset without relying on positive affirmations?

You can begin changing your mindset by testing your assumptions against evidence rather than simply replacing them with more positive statements. The Tape Check encourages you to identify a recurring belief, investigate its origins, and conduct a small experiment that challenges or clarifies it. The goal is to develop a more accurate narrative grounded in experience, including the uncertainty and imperfect progress that often accompany meaningful change.

What is the connection between limiting beliefs and personal agency?

Personal agency involves recognizing your capacity to make choices and influence how you respond to your circumstances. Limiting beliefs can narrow that sense of possibility by making inherited assumptions feel like unchangeable rules. The Architecture of Agency, the series framework explored in this episode, emphasizes that recognizing how environments shape beliefs creates an opportunity to respond more intentionally and test alternatives.

How can you help someone else overcome limiting beliefs?

You can help someone question limiting beliefs by creating an environment where they feel seen, heard, valued, and encouraged. Dr. Alexis Redding’s experiences illustrate how meaningful recognition can affect a student’s sense of belonging, while the episode’s closing challenge encourages listeners to share the imperfect middle of their own stories. Honest encouragement and specific examples can help others see possibilities they may not yet recognize in themselves.

In this episode of Passion Struck, John R. Miles speaks with bestselling author Jon Acuff about the psychology of procrastination, the fear and perfectionism that keep us stuck, and the internal narratives that influence what we believe we can accomplish. Their conversation explores how to move beyond overthinking, recognize the limiting beliefs that quietly shape our decisions, and build a life in which our actions increasingly reflect the person we hope to become.

What Is Procrastination, Really?

Procrastination is often treated as a problem of time management, as though the solution were simply to become more organized, build a better schedule, or develop stronger habits. Jon Acuff offers a more revealing definition: procrastination occurs when our actions do not match our intentions. The distinction matters because it shifts the question from how we use our time to what happens between the things we say we want and the things we actually do.

Consider someone who wants to write a book. They research the publishing industry, compare writing routines, study successful authors, and spend months refining their idea. Each activity appears productive, and some of it may genuinely be useful. Yet if preparation continually replaces the difficult work of writing, the person can become increasingly knowledgeable about the project while remaining no closer to completing it. The same pattern appears when someone wants to change careers, improve their health, or begin a meaningful creative pursuit. Planning offers a sense of movement while protecting us from the uncertainty that comes with doing something real.

Acuff challenges the assumption that procrastination is simply a personal weakness or a reliable part of someone’s creative process. People sometimes remember a deadline they managed to meet at the last minute and conclude that pressure brings out their best work. Over time, that experience can become a justification for delaying the next project, even though an early start would leave more room to revise, learn, and improve. As Acuff explains, a first draft is rarely the best draft, and meaningful work usually develops through repeated attempts rather than a single burst of last-minute effort.

Recognizing the intention-action gap gives us a more useful place to begin. Instead of judging ourselves for being lazy or undisciplined, we can examine the moment when a worthwhile intention turns into avoidance. What are we anticipating? What uncertainty are we trying to escape? What would taking the first imperfect step require of us? Those questions help turn procrastination from a vague source of frustration into a pattern we can understand and gradually change.

Why Fear and Perfectionism Keep You Stuck

Fear often becomes most influential when it can present itself as a reasonable argument. We tell ourselves that we need more information before we begin, that our skills are not quite ready, or that we should wait until circumstances become more favorable. Sometimes those concerns are legitimate. At other times, they are ways of postponing the moment when our work, abilities, or ambitions will be tested by reality.

Acuff describes fear as one of the most persuasive obstacles to taking action because it can make avoidance feel responsible. Perfectionism reinforces that tendency by establishing standards that are difficult to satisfy before beginning. If we believe the first attempt must be excellent, the first decision must be correct, or the first step must reveal the entire path ahead, starting becomes an unusually demanding psychological task. We are trying to eliminate the very uncertainty that experience is supposed to help us navigate.

Modern life adds another layer to the problem. Digital entertainment and constant streams of information compete for our attention, offering immediate rewards while meaningful projects often require sustained effort before they produce visible results. Acuff observes that procrastination is particularly well supported by a culture filled with distractions. A difficult task asks us to tolerate uncertainty and delayed gratification, while a familiar distraction offers an immediate way to change how we feel.

Overcoming perfectionism therefore requires a different relationship with the beginning of a task. A first attempt can be an experiment rather than a verdict on our ability. A draft can reveal what we need to learn. A short period of focused work can tell us whether an idea deserves further investment. When we allow action to generate information, we stop demanding that confidence arrive before experience has had a chance to build it.

The practical question becomes how to make the next step small enough to take while keeping it connected to something that matters. That might mean writing a rough opening paragraph, spending fifteen minutes exploring a possible career direction, or testing a new routine for a week. Small actions cannot guarantee success, but they can replace speculation with evidence, helping us discover what works and what needs to change.

In this episode, you’ll learn

• Why procrastination happens when your actions stop matching your intentions, and how fear, perfectionism, and overthinking can keep meaningful goals perpetually out of reach.
• How to recognize the limiting beliefs and inherited messages that shape your identity, influence your decisions, and quietly determine which opportunities you allow yourself to pursue.
• How Jon Acuff’s four permissions- dream, plan, do, and review– can help you turn an ambition into a practical process of action, experimentation, and learning.
• Why comparison can make you feel behind even when you are making progress, and how to challenge the internal narratives that convince you your opportunities have already passed.
• How desire creates discipline by giving your effort a meaningful purpose, and why experimenting with a goal can help you discover what genuinely motivates you.
• Why recognizing that your actions matter can help you move beyond apathy, pursue meaningful goals, and build a richer life across your career, finances, relationships, health, and enjoyment.

How Your Identity and Internal Stories Shape What You Attempt

The beliefs that influence our ambitions often have histories of their own. A teacher may have described us as someone who lacks leadership ability. A parent may have communicated that financial security requires choosing a conventional career. A workplace may have rewarded us for staying within established boundaries until we gradually stopped offering ideas that might challenge them. These experiences can become internal messages that continue to shape our decisions long after the original circumstances have changed.

Acuff explores this pattern through the metaphor of the signs people carry in their stands. The signs represent messages we have absorbed from parents, teachers, colleagues, and other influential people. An individual who was once told they were not a natural leader might spend decades approaching leadership opportunities with suspicion, interpreting the possibility of failure as evidence that the original judgment was correct. Another person might associate professional success with disloyalty to their family or believe that pursuing a different life will place important relationships at risk.

The power of these messages comes partly from how familiar they become. Repeated thoughts can begin to feel like objective descriptions of reality, even when they reflect an old experience, someone else’s expectations, or a fear that has never been examined. Once a belief becomes part of our identity, we may organize our choices around preserving it. We avoid the opportunity that could challenge it, then interpret the absence of new experience as confirmation that the belief was accurate.

Acuff encourages people to identify the signs they are carrying and consider which messages deserve to be rewritten. This process requires more than replacing a negative thought with an optimistic one. It involves examining where a belief came from, understanding how it has influenced our behavior, and deciding whether it remains a useful guide for the life we want to build. We can acknowledge that a message once affected us while recognizing that it does not have to determine every future decision.

This becomes especially important when we compare our progress with the lives we see around us. Acuff notes that people can feel behind even when they have accomplished a great deal, particularly when social media makes other people’s milestones constantly visible. Comparison removes context: we see someone else’s promotion, achievement, or breakthrough without seeing the years of uncertainty, compromise, or ordinary work that preceded it. A more constructive measure of progress asks whether our choices are moving us toward a life that reflects our own values, capacities, and responsibilities.

A Book Designed Around the Psychology of Getting Started

When Jon Acuff talks about Procrastination Proof, one of the most revealing details is the care he put into the book’s structure. By the time he wrote it, he had published eleven books, and he understood that the experience of reading can either support a reader’s momentum or make an already difficult task feel heavier. For a book about procrastination, a long and intimidating format would have worked against the very behavior it was designed to help people change.

Acuff chose to organize Procrastination Proof into 71 short chapters. He explains that readers who struggle with procrastination often benefit from frequent experiences of completion. Finishing a chapter provides a small but tangible sense of progress, making it easier to return to the book and continue learning. The chapters are not simply disconnected essays; the format reflects a deliberate effort to make the material approachable for readers who may already feel overwhelmed by the projects they want to finish.

That design choice offers a broader lesson about how we structure our own goals. When a project feels too large to approach comfortably, the difficulty may come partly from how we have framed the work. A book becomes a chapter, a chapter becomes a page, and a page becomes a paragraph. A career change becomes a conversation, a research session, or one application. Breaking a task into meaningful units does not diminish the ambition behind it. It creates more opportunities to engage with the work and learn from the experience.

During the conversation, Acuff also distinguishes the desire to accomplish something from the discipline required to sustain it. He describes how his interest in blogging gave him a reason to get up early, reduce television time, and pursue freelance work while raising a young family. The discipline followed a desire that had become important enough to change his behavior. That experience informs one of his central ideas: desire creates discipline because people are more willing to tolerate discomfort when they understand what the effort makes possible.

For anyone unsure about what to pursue next, Acuff suggests auditioning a goal. Try one possible direction for fifteen minutes a day over seven consecutive days and observe whether the experience creates enough interest to continue. The point is to gather information about what engages you before reorganizing your life around an assumption. A short experiment can reveal a genuine source of motivation, clarify what matters, or show that another direction deserves consideration.

Procrastination Proof is useful in this context because it approaches progress as a process that can be examined and practiced. The goal is to make starting more manageable, understand the mental patterns that interrupt action, and build a repeatable way of moving from intention to experience. Readers can explore the book as a practical companion to the questions raised in this conversation about fear, motivation, and the kind of life they want to create.

The Four Permissions That Help You Move Forward

One of the most practical parts of Acuff’s approach is his framework of four permissions: permission to dream, permission to plan, permission to do, and permission to review. Each stage serves a different purpose, and difficulty often arises when we neglect one of them or try to move through the process in the wrong order.

Permission to dream creates space to consider what we genuinely want. Many people become skilled at managing obligations while losing contact with their own aspirations. They can explain what their job requires, what their family needs, and what their schedule allows, yet struggle to articulate what would make their lives feel more meaningful. Dreaming helps restore that connection. It allows a possible future to become specific enough to generate interest and desire.

Permission to plan turns that possibility into a path. Planning helps identify resources, constraints, milestones, and the next realistic action. It does not require predicting every obstacle or designing a perfect strategy. A plan is a working hypothesis about how to move forward, one that can be adjusted as new information becomes available. Its purpose is to create direction while leaving room for discovery.

Permission to do is where intention meets experience. This is the stage at which the person begins writing, applies for the position, practices the skill, or tests the idea. The work may feel awkward because competence develops through repetition, and early attempts rarely resemble the finished result we imagined. Acuff’s approach makes room for that uneven beginning, recognizing that action can refine a goal in ways that extended reflection cannot.

Permission to review completes the cycle. Reflection allows us to examine what happened, what we learned, and whether the original plan still serves the goal. Some people continue working without considering whether their efforts are effective; others abandon a promising direction after one disappointing result. Reviewing creates a more balanced response. It helps us distinguish between a goal that needs a different strategy and a goal that no longer deserves our investment.

The four permissions also explain why a single productivity technique rarely solves procrastination for everyone. Someone who has abundant ideas but never starts may need to emphasize doing. Someone who works relentlessly without a clear sense of direction may need to return to dreaming. Someone who begins many projects but rarely learns from the results may need to develop a more deliberate review process. Progress becomes easier to sustain when the missing part of the cycle receives attention.

SPONSORED DEALS

FODZYME

We’re so excited to partner with FODZYME and offer you 30% off your first order when you go to I Can Eat Again dot com slash PASSIONSTRUCK.

SHOPIFY

It’s time to turn those “What Ifs” into SFX: CHA-CHING with Shopify today. Sign up for your one-dollar-per-month trial today at SHOPIFY DOT COM SLASH passionstruck.

Vinted

Ready to clean out your closet and make some extra money? Download the Vinted app for free and start listing. With no seller fees, you keep every dollar you earn.

About Today’s Guest, Jon Acuff

Jon Acuff is a bestselling author, speaker, and goal-setting expert whose work explores the relationship between mindset, ambition, and meaningful achievement. Across books including Soundtracks and Procrastination Proof, he examines how the internal narratives people carry can shape their decisions, limit their sense of possibility, and influence whether they follow through on their goals.

Known for combining research, humor, personal experience, and practical strategies, Acuff helps readers recognize patterns such as overthinking and perfectionism and develop more effective ways to move forward. He also hosts the podcast All It Takes Is a Goal, where he explores what it takes to pursue a more remarkable life.

Why Your Brain Says ‘What’s the Point?’ Before You Even Start | Jon Acuff

Learn More and Connect

👉 All episode links, my books You Matter, Luma, and The Mattering Effect, The Ignited Life newsletter, and the Start Mattering store are here: linktr.ee/John_R_Miles

FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions)

Why do I procrastinate even when something matters to me?

Procrastination can occur precisely because a goal matters. Meaningful work often exposes us to uncertainty, the possibility of criticism, and the discomfort of discovering that our current abilities fall short of our ambitions. Avoidance offers temporary relief from those feelings, but the relief can reinforce the habit of delaying the task. Understanding what makes a particular goal emotionally difficult can help you choose a more useful first step.

How do I stop procrastinating and take action?

Begin by identifying the specific intention that has not translated into action and examining what repeatedly interrupts it. Then define a small, observable step that you can take without resolving every uncertainty in advance. Instead of waiting for the ideal conditions, treat the first attempt as an opportunity to learn. Review what happens, adjust your approach, and use the information you gain to determine the next step.

Is procrastination caused by fear or perfectionism?

Fear and perfectionism are common contributors, although procrastination can have several causes, including unclear goals, competing demands, difficulty regulating emotions, and challenges with attention or executive functioning. Fear may lead someone to avoid criticism, while perfectionism can make an imperfect beginning feel unacceptable. Identifying the specific pattern behind your delay is more useful than assuming every instance of procrastination has the same explanation.

What are the four permissions Jon Acuff describes?

Jon Acuff’s four permissions are permission to dream, permission to plan, permission to do, and permission to review. Dreaming helps clarify what you want, planning creates a workable direction, doing turns intention into experience, and reviewing allows you to learn from the result. The framework helps people identify which part of the process needs attention instead of relying on a single strategy for every obstacle.

How does identity affect procrastination?

Identity influences the opportunities we consider, the risks we tolerate, and the explanations we give ourselves when something feels difficult. Messages absorbed from family, school, or work can become assumptions about what we are capable of doing or what kind of success is acceptable. When those assumptions go unexamined, they can lead us to avoid experiences that might challenge them. Reflecting on the origin of these beliefs can help us decide whether they still deserve to guide our choices.

How can I stop overthinking and start making progress?

Overthinking often continues when we expect reflection to remove all uncertainty before we act. A more productive approach is to decide what you need to know for the next step, take that step, and let the experience inform your thinking. You can research, plan, and prepare while also setting a clear point at which preparation ends and action begins. This allows your decisions to develop through both reflection and real-world feedback.

What’s the difference between motivation and discipline?

Motivation describes the reasons, interests, or desires that draw us toward a goal, while discipline helps us continue taking action when the process becomes demanding. Acuff emphasizes that a meaningful desire can make discipline easier to sustain because it gives discomfort a purpose. Rather than depending entirely on willpower, identify what makes a goal worth pursuing and create routines that help you act on that reason consistently.

How can small wins help me overcome procrastination?

Small wins provide concrete evidence that your effort can produce progress. They can make an intimidating project easier to approach, reveal what works, and give you a reason to continue. A small step is especially useful when it is connected to a larger intention, because it helps preserve direction while reducing the psychological burden of beginning. Over time, these experiences can strengthen confidence through evidence rather than expectation.

The psychology of anticipation helps explain why the future can influence our emotions in the present. When we imagine positive experiences ahead, we can begin enjoying them before they happen. This process can strengthen motivation, create a sense of hope, and help us find meaning in ordinary days. As explored in the Passion Struck approach to living with purpose and finding meaning and direction, the way we envision our future can influence how we experience the life we are living now.

But anticipation is more than daydreaming about what comes next. It is a psychological process that can shape our attention, decisions, expectations, and emotional well-being.

In this article, you will learn how anticipation works, why looking forward to something can improve your mood, when future thinking becomes counterproductive, and how to create more meaningful things to anticipate in everyday life.

What Is the Psychology of Anticipation?

The psychology of anticipation examines how people think, feel, and behave in response to events they expect to happen in the future. It explores how our expectations influence present emotions, motivation, decision-making, and perceptions of well-being.

Anticipation allows the mind to experience a possible future before it becomes reality. When you imagine reuniting with someone you love, completing a challenging project, or exploring a new place, your brain begins responding to the experience you are mentally representing.

Psychologists distinguish between two related experiences:

Anticipatory pleasure is the enjoyment you experience while looking forward to something. It is the excitement you feel when planning a trip or imagining a rewarding conversation.

Anticipated pleasure is the enjoyment you expect to feel when the event actually occurs. It is your prediction that the trip will be exciting or the conversation will be meaningful.

These experiences are connected, but they are not identical. You might enjoy planning a vacation even more than you expect to enjoy certain parts of the trip itself.

Research published in Emotion by researchers examining episodic future thinking found that deliberately imagining positive future events increased the vividness of those events and feelings of pleasure associated with them. The findings suggest that mentally experiencing a desirable future can influence how we feel before it arrives.

This is one reason anticipation deserves more attention in conversations about happiness. Well-being does not depend exclusively on what happens to us. It can also depend on how we imagine, interpret, and prepare for what might happen next.

Why Looking Forward to Something Can Make You Happier

Anticipation can create a valuable emotional experience between the present moment and a future event. Instead of waiting passively for happiness to arrive, we can begin experiencing some of its emotional benefits in advance.

Several psychological processes help explain why this happens.

1. Anticipation Gives the Brain Something Positive to Imagine

When you anticipate a rewarding experience, you mentally simulate what it might be like. You might picture the people you will see, the places you will visit, or the satisfaction you will feel after reaching a goal.

This mental simulation can generate positive emotions before the event occurs.

A 2007 study by Leaf Van Boven and Laurence Ashworth, published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, found across five experiments that anticipation often produced more intense emotional responses than remembering comparable events afterward. One explanation was that people mentally simulated future experiences more extensively than they simulated past ones.

This does not mean every imagined experience will be more enjoyable than the real thing. Expectations can be inaccurate, and imagined outcomes can disappoint us. However, the research illustrates how powerfully our mental representations of the future can influence present emotions.

Consider someone planning a weekend with friends. The experience may involve only two days, but the anticipation can begin weeks earlier. Choosing activities, exchanging messages, and imagining shared memories can create several smaller moments of enjoyment before the weekend begins.

The future becomes a source of positive emotion in the present.

2. Anticipation Can Make Ordinary Days Feel More Meaningful

A day can feel different when it contains something you genuinely look forward to.

Perhaps you have scheduled time to work on a creative project, planned dinner with a loved one, or committed to learning a new skill. These events might seem small, but they give your day a point of connection to something beyond immediate obligations.

Anticipation creates a psychological bridge between what you are doing now and what you hope to experience later.

This connection matters because daily life can easily become dominated by repetitive responsibilities. Work, errands, household tasks, and deadlines can consume our attention until the week feels like something to get through rather than something to experience.

A meaningful future event can interrupt that pattern.

The goal is not to make every day exciting. It is to create moments that remind you why your time matters. This connects with the ideas behind the daily practice of personal growth, where small, deliberate actions help transform everyday routines into opportunities for development.

When you have something meaningful ahead, the present can feel less like an obstacle and more like part of the journey.

3. Positive Anticipation Can Strengthen Motivation

Looking forward to a desirable outcome can make it easier to take action toward it.

Imagine training for your first 5K, preparing for an important presentation, or working toward a professional milestone. The result may be weeks or months away, but imagining its significance can help you stay connected to the effort required today.

Anticipation supports motivation by giving present actions a future-oriented purpose.

It can also make progress more emotionally rewarding. Instead of focusing exclusively on how far you still have to go, you can imagine what completing the journey might mean to you.

However, motivation is not guaranteed simply because you imagine success. Positive expectations work best when they are connected to realistic plans, achievable steps, and a willingness to tolerate discomfort along the way.

A useful question is: What can I do today that brings the future I want one step closer?

That question turns anticipation from passive wishing into purposeful action.

4. Anticipation Can Help Us Experience Hope

Hope involves more than believing that something good might happen. It also includes a sense that meaningful possibilities remain available and that our actions can help us move toward them.

Anticipation can support this outlook by directing attention toward possibilities that might otherwise be overlooked.

Someone navigating a difficult career transition, for example, might begin anticipating the freedom to explore a new field, develop different skills, or work in an environment better aligned with personal values.

The transition may remain uncertain. There may be setbacks and uncomfortable decisions. Yet the ability to imagine a worthwhile future can help make the uncertainty more manageable.

Hope does not require certainty. It requires recognizing that the present is not the only possible version of your life.

When anticipation is grounded in realistic possibilities, it can help people remain engaged even when the path forward is unclear.

The Science Behind Anticipation and Happiness

The relationship between anticipation and happiness has attracted interest in psychology, neuroscience, and behavioral science.

Research suggests that positive future thinking can influence emotional experience, although the effects depend on the person, the imagined event, and the way the anticipation unfolds.

A 2017 study published in Frontiers in Psychology investigated how people anticipated positive and neutral future events using functional magnetic resonance imaging. The researchers found greater activation in parts of the medial prefrontal cortex during anticipation of positive events than during anticipation of neutral events. Some of these neural responses were associated with participants’ reported well-being.

The study involved 40 participants, so its findings should be interpreted within that limited sample. It offers evidence of a relationship between positive anticipation, brain activity, and well-being, rather than proof that anticipation alone causes happiness.

Another important concept is savoring.

Savoring refers to the ways people notice, appreciate, and enhance positive experiences. Psychologists commonly describe three temporal forms of savoring:

• Anticipatory savoring: Enjoying a positive experience before it happens.
• Present-moment savoring: Appreciating a positive experience while it unfolds.
• Reminiscent savoring: Recalling a positive experience after it has happened.

These processes can work together. You might anticipate a family gathering, enjoy being with everyone when the day arrives, and later revisit the memory with gratitude.

A 2012 daily-diary study by Paul E. Jose, Bee T. Lim, and Fred B. Bryant found that positive daily experiences, savoring responses, and momentary happy mood were positively related. Although the study examined savoring more broadly rather than anticipation alone, it reinforces the importance of how people respond emotionally to positive experiences.

Together, this research suggests that happiness can be influenced not only by the experiences we have but also by how we engage with them before, during, and after they occur.

How to Practice Positive Anticipation in Everyday Life

You do not need a major milestone or an expensive experience to benefit from anticipation. Small, meaningful possibilities can provide something to look forward to while helping you remain engaged with daily life.

The following practices can help you cultivate positive anticipation without becoming overly attached to outcomes.

1. Schedule One Meaningful Thing to Look Forward To

Choose something in the coming days that you genuinely want to experience.

It could be a walk somewhere peaceful, a meal with someone you care about, an hour spent reading, or time devoted to a creative interest.

Give the experience a place in your calendar. This turns a vague intention into a concrete possibility.

The activity does not need to be impressive or productive. Its value comes from the enjoyment, connection, curiosity, or restoration it offers.

Regularly creating these moments can help prevent life from becoming an endless sequence of responsibilities.

2. Use Future Thinking to Connect With Your Values

Not everything worth anticipating is immediately pleasurable.

You might look forward to finishing a difficult course, having an honest conversation, or building the confidence to try something unfamiliar.

These experiences can involve discomfort as well as excitement. Their value comes partly from what they represent.

Ask yourself:

• What kind of person do I want to become?
• What experiences would help me live closer to my values?
• What small step could I take this week toward that future?

This approach makes future thinking more purposeful. Rather than imagining an ideal life detached from reality, you begin identifying experiences that reflect what genuinely matters to you.

3. Make the Preparation Part of the Experience

Anticipation can become more enjoyable when you deliberately appreciate the process leading up to an event.

If you are planning a trip, explore places you would like to visit. If you are learning something new, celebrate the progress you make during preparation. If you are reconnecting with a friend, take time to reflect on what you appreciate about the relationship.

You are not merely waiting for the main event. You are creating smaller experiences that carry some of its meaning into the present.

This practice also reduces the tendency to treat the days before a positive event as disposable time.

4. Keep Your Expectations Flexible

Imagine the future you want, but allow reality to surprise you.

A gathering might be meaningful even if the conversation takes an unexpected direction. A new project might teach you something valuable even if the outcome differs from your original plan.

Flexible expectations help preserve the emotional benefits of anticipation without requiring everything to unfold perfectly.

Instead of asking, “How can I make sure this experience is exactly what I imagined?” try asking, “What would make this experience meaningful, even if it unfolds differently?”

That change creates room for curiosity rather than pressure.

5. Practice Enjoying the Present While Preparing for the Future

Anticipation works best when it complements present-moment awareness.

If you spend every day waiting for the weekend, every month waiting for a holiday, or every year waiting for a major achievement, you risk overlooking the life already happening around you.

You can look forward to tomorrow without treating today as a problem to endure.

One way to practice this balance is to identify three things each evening: something you appreciated today, something you are looking forward to, and one action that could help make that future experience more meaningful.

This simple reflection acknowledges the past, engages with the present, and creates a positive connection with the future.

Over time, it can help you recognize that a meaningful life is not built exclusively from major events. It also emerges from the small experiences you learn to notice and appreciate.

What Anticipation Teaches Us About Meaning and Mattering

There is a deeper reason anticipation can influence how we experience our lives: the future we imagine often reveals what we value.

The experiences we look forward to can tell us something about our relationships, ambitions, interests, and sense of purpose. We might anticipate a family gathering because connection matters to us, a challenging project because growth feels important, or a quiet morning because we need space to think.

These expectations are not simply predictions about what will happen. They can offer clues about what makes life feel worthwhile.

This idea connects with the broader Passion Struck perspective on human significance and the science of mattering. Mattering concerns the experience of feeling valued and knowing that our presence and actions make a difference. Meaningful future experiences often involve opportunities to strengthen those feelings, whether through relationships, contribution, learning, or personal development.

Anticipation can also help us recognize the difference between what attracts our attention and what deserves our time.

A person might spend weeks looking forward to professional recognition because achievement has become the main measure of success. Another might look forward to mentoring a colleague because helping someone grow provides a deeper sense of contribution.

Neither experience is inherently wrong. But reflecting on what we anticipate can help us examine whether our goals reflect our own values or expectations we have absorbed from others.

John R. Miles’s work through Passion Struck explores how intentional choices can shape a more meaningful and fulfilling life. From that perspective, the value of anticipation is not merely that it helps us feel happier while waiting. It can also help us clarify what kind of future is worth building.

The question becomes more than “What am I looking forward to?”

It becomes “What does that tell me about the life I want to create?”

Final Thoughts: Let the Future Enrich the Present

The psychology of anticipation reminds us that happiness is not always confined to the moment something good happens. Sometimes, it begins when we first imagine the possibility.

A conversation you are looking forward to, a skill you are developing, a relationship you are nurturing, or a goal you are pursuing can all bring meaning into your present experience.

But anticipation is most useful when it encourages engagement rather than endless waiting. Imagining a better future can help you identify what matters, but taking meaningful action is what begins to bring that future into reach.

You do not need to make every day extraordinary. You can begin by creating one small thing to look forward to, understanding why it matters, and allowing yourself to enjoy both the preparation and the experience itself.

The future is not guaranteed to unfold as you imagine. Yet you can still use your hopes to guide your choices, strengthen your relationships, and make the present more meaningful.

The real power of anticipation is not simply that it gives you something to wait for. It is that it can help you discover what is worth moving toward—and remind you that life is happening along the way.

References and Further Reading

1. Van Boven, L., & Ashworth, L. (2007). Looking forward, looking back: Anticipation is more evocative than retrospection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(2), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.289
2. Luo, Y., et al. (2017). Well-being and anticipation for future positive events: Evidences from an fMRI study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2199. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02199
3. Jose, P. E., Lim, B. T., & Bryant, F. B. (2012). Does savoring increase happiness? A daily diary study. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(3), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2012.671345
4. Bryant, F. B. (2021). Current progress and future directions for theory and research on savoring. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.771698
5. Hallford, D. J., et al. (2020). Increasing anticipated and anticipatory pleasure through episodic thinking. Emotion. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000765

Frequently Asked Questions About the Psychology of Anticipation

In this episode of Passion Struck, I speak with Dr. Alexis Redding, a developmental psychologist and higher education researcher whose work offers an unusually revealing perspective on these questions. Her research took an unexpected turn in 2016, when she discovered a clue suggesting that a collection of college student interviews from the 1970s might still exist. The original research team had abandoned the study in 1979, leaving behind a trail of recordings, essays, research notes, and other documents that had effectively disappeared from view. Alexis spent a year reconstructing the archive, reopening a window into the lives of students navigating a period of profound personal change.

What makes this discovery so compelling is the recognition that followed. When contemporary students encountered the voices of their predecessors, they found familiar experiences of loneliness, identity formation, parental expectations, and anxiety about the future. Students who had lived decades apart recognized something of themselves in one another. The circumstances surrounding their lives had changed, but many of the emotional questions they faced remained remarkably consistent.

Our conversation explores what these connections can teach us about young adult mental health, why belonging has such a powerful influence on student well-being, and how cultural expectations around achievement and perfection can make it difficult to acknowledge struggle. We also examine the responsibility colleges, families, and communities share in helping young people develop the confidence to explore, make mistakes, and change direction as they build their lives.

What 1970s College Students Reveal About Young Adult Mental Health

The story behind Alexis’s research begins with an archive that almost disappeared. While investigating the work of William Perry, whose research helped establish the field of college student development, Alexis discovered evidence that interviews conducted with students in the 1970s might still be recoverable. The original study had documented students’ experiences across their college years, creating a record of how their thinking, identities, and expectations evolved over time. Finding the materials required patience and detective work, but reconstructing the archive allowed the research to continue across generations.

The historical comparison produced a result that challenged the assumption that today’s young people inhabit an entirely different emotional world from the one their parents and grandparents experienced. Students reviewing the earlier interviews recognized familiar concerns about independence, belonging, family expectations, and the uncertainty of choosing a future. The people in the recordings were living in a different social and technological environment, yet their questions about identity and adulthood remained recognizable.

Alexis also describes the significance of reconnecting with members of the original study, including people who graduated in 1975 and were able to listen to their own recordings again. Revisiting those earlier voices gave them an opportunity to reflect on their younger selves and reconsider how they had understood their lives at the time. Some recognized that hearing these experiences when they were younger might have influenced how they later parented, taught, or supported the next generation.

This research offers a valuable perspective on mental health in college because it places present-day difficulties within the broader story of human development. Contemporary conditions can intensify uncertainty and create new pressures, but the underlying experience of growing into adulthood has a longer history. Recognizing that continuity can help us replace generational blame with more thoughtful questions about what young people need, how they experience the world, and where meaningful support can begin.

Why Mental Health in College Requires a Broader Cultural Perspective

When conversations about youth mental health focus on a single cause, they can overlook the complicated interaction between individual development and the environments in which young people live. Social media, academic expectations, reduced opportunities for independent exploration, perfectionism, and wider cultural pressures all deserve consideration. Alexis’s argument is that the challenge becomes easier to understand when we recognize how these factors can interact with longstanding difficulties surrounding identity, independence, and uncertainty.

The distinction matters because the explanations we choose influence the solutions we pursue. If every struggle is interpreted as an individual problem, responsibility tends to fall on the student to become more resilient, perform better, or seek help when something goes wrong. Those responses can be valuable, but they remain incomplete when the surrounding environment contributes to the difficulty. A student who believes everyone else is succeeding effortlessly may find it hard to admit confusion, even when uncertainty is a normal part of learning and development.

In our conversation, I reflect on how similar patterns appear in organizational culture. Leaders often interpret performance problems as shortcomings within individuals, only to discover that expectations, incentives, and the broader working environment are contributing to the problem. Alexis sees a comparable dynamic in higher education. The way students are evaluated, the stories told about achievement, and the signals they receive from faculty and peers can shape whether they experience college as a place where they can grow or as a place where they must continually prove their worth.

This perspective also connects to the idea of systemic unmattering: the experience of being valued primarily for what we produce, how we perform, or how well we meet expectations. When achievement becomes the dominant measure of a person’s value, it becomes harder to acknowledge the ordinary uncertainty that accompanies growth. Supporting student mental health therefore involves more than providing services after a problem emerges. It also requires examining the cultures that shape students’ daily experiences and creating conditions in which asking for help, admitting difficulty, and learning through mistakes are treated as legitimate parts of development.

In this episode, you’ll learn

• How Dr. Alexis Redding recovered a forgotten archive of student interviews from the 1970s and what it revealed about the experiences shared across generations.
• Why mental health in college is influenced by developmental challenges, cultural expectations, and the environments in which students live and learn.
• How a sense of belonging can support student well-being, help-seeking, academic persistence, and the confidence to navigate unfamiliar situations.
• Why effortless perfection can make students reluctant to acknowledge uncertainty, and how honest stories about failure can create opportunities for connection.
• How colleges, families, and educators can build cultures of care that recognize students as people rather than reducing their value to achievement or performance.
• Why exploration, course correction, and career reinvention are essential parts of growing into adulthood.

How Belonging Helps College Students Navigate Uncertainty

Belonging is one of the clearest themes to emerge from Alexis’s research. She explains that students who experience a stronger sense of belonging tend to fare better academically, are more likely to seek help when they need it, and are more likely to remain in college and graduate. These outcomes reveal why belonging deserves attention as a central part of student well-being rather than as a pleasant addition to the college experience.

The importance of belonging becomes especially apparent during transitions. Students entering college are often navigating unfamiliar expectations, new relationships, greater independence, and questions about whether they have chosen the right path. At precisely the moment when they need opportunities to establish connections, they may feel least certain about where they fit. Small interactions can therefore carry considerable meaning, particularly during the first days of a new environment, when students are beginning to form impressions of the people and institutions around them.

Alexis shares an example from the Harvard Graduate School of Education, where a dean welcomed incoming online students by telling them, “You belong here. You were chosen.” The message was direct, but its significance extended beyond the words themselves. It communicated that the students had been selected intentionally and were legitimate members of the community they were entering. Alexis also recounts a moment when she recognized a student whose application she had read. The student became emotional when she realized that someone remembered her, offering a vivid illustration of how being noticed can make a person feel that their presence matters.

These moments reveal that belonging is built through both institutional practices and everyday human interactions. A university can speak about community in its mission statement, but students experience that commitment through the people who remember their names, listen carefully to their concerns, and demonstrate that they are valued beyond their performance. When students feel supported in this way, they have a stronger foundation from which to take intellectual risks, ask questions, recover from setbacks, and develop a more confident relationship with uncertainty.

The Hidden Pressure of Perfectionism and the Stories We Tell About Success

Young people often encounter carefully edited accounts of success long before they enter college. They see the achievements, decisions, and milestones that make other people’s lives appear coherent, while the uncertainty and setbacks that preceded those outcomes remain largely invisible. In an environment shaped by academic competition and expectations of effortless success, students can begin to interpret their own struggles as evidence that they are falling behind.

Alexis discusses the pressure associated with effortless perfection, a culture in which people feel compelled to appear accomplished and in control without revealing the effort or difficulty behind their achievements. The problem is that this expectation can isolate students precisely when they need connection. If everyone appears confident, each person may assume that their own doubts are unusual, creating a cycle in which uncertainty remains hidden and opportunities for support become harder to find.

One way to interrupt this pattern is to tell more honest stories about the process of growing and changing. Adults often share the polished version of their careers, emphasizing the decisions that worked and the accomplishments that followed. Young people can benefit just as much from hearing about rejection, indecision, disappointing results, and the moments when someone had to reconsider a plan. These experiences help reveal how often meaningful progress emerges through adjustment rather than through a perfectly executed path.

The stories we choose to share can therefore influence how young people interpret their own experiences. When parents, educators, and leaders speak openly about uncertainty and explain how they recovered from setbacks, they offer a more realistic account of what development looks like. They also communicate that a difficult period does not have to become a permanent judgment about a person’s abilities or future. Struggle becomes easier to discuss when people can recognize it as part of a shared human experience rather than a private failure they must conceal.

The Research Behind Mental Health in College: A More Human Approach to Student Well-being

When Alexis began working with the research and ideas that informed Mental Health in College: What Research Tells Us About Supporting Students, one of the most important questions was how to understand student well-being beyond the individual experiences that are easiest to see. A student may appear disengaged, overwhelmed, or reluctant to ask for help, and it can be tempting to treat that behavior as a problem contained within the student. Yet the surrounding environment may be influencing whether that person feels comfortable enough to speak openly, seek support, or believe that they belong.

That question connects the book to the archival research Alexis describes in our conversation. Looking across generations allows researchers to recognize the enduring challenges of becoming an adult, while examining campus culture helps explain how institutions can either support students through those challenges or make them more difficult to navigate. The book brings research on college student mental health into a broader discussion of the experiences and systems that shape student life, including academic pressures, financial stress, and the different circumstances students bring to higher education.

What makes this perspective valuable is its emphasis on shared responsibility. Student mental health is affected by individual needs, but it is also shaped by relationships, expectations, and institutional practices. Creating a more supportive college experience therefore requires attention to the entire environment in which students learn and develop. The goal is to build communities where students can seek help, form meaningful connections, and learn from difficult experiences while retaining the agency to make their own decisions.

For readers who want to understand the research behind these questions, Mental Health in College offers a deeper exploration of how higher education can respond to student needs. It complements the central message of Alexis’s interview: supporting young adults begins with understanding their experiences, listening to what they tell us, and creating environments where they can grow as people as well as students.

Growing Into Adulthood Through Exploration, Failure, and Reinvention

College often carries an expectation that students should use their years of study to identify a future profession, develop a stable identity, and prepare to enter adult life with a clear sense of direction. For some people, that process unfolds relatively smoothly. For others, the years after graduation bring new questions about work, relationships, responsibilities, and the kind of life they want to build. Alexis’s research encourages a more flexible understanding of adulthood, one that makes room for exploration and acknowledges that development continues long after a degree has been earned.

The ability to change direction is an important part of that process. A student may choose a field because it satisfies family expectations, offers financial security, or seems to provide a clear route forward, only to discover through experience that their interests and priorities are different. Learning to recognize that mismatch and respond thoughtfully requires a degree of agency: the ability to reflect on one’s circumstances, consider alternatives, and make decisions about what comes next. These skills develop through practice, especially when people have opportunities to explore possibilities without treating every change of course as a failure.

The archival research offers a useful reminder that the uncertainty experienced by young adults today is connected to questions earlier generations also faced. Members of the class of 1975 went on to make significant changes in their professional lives, illustrating that graduation rarely settles every question about identity or purpose. Their experiences complicate the idea that a successful life follows one predetermined route and suggest that the capacity to adapt can matter as much as the ability to make an initial choice.

For parents, educators, and institutions, this perspective creates a different responsibility. Supporting young adults means helping them develop judgment, resilience, and the confidence to reconsider their plans when new information or experience calls for it. It also means allowing them to encounter challenges while remaining connected to people who can offer perspective and support. When young people understand that adulthood includes periods of uncertainty and reinvention, they can approach the future with greater flexibility and a more realistic sense of what growth asks of them.

SPONSORED DEALS

FODZYME

We’re so excited to partner with FODZYME and offer you 30% off your first order when you go to I Can Eat Again dot com slash PASSIONSTRUCK.

SHOPIFY

It’s time to turn those “What Ifs” into SFX: CHA-CHING with Shopify today. Sign up for your one-dollar-per-month trial today at SHOPIFY DOT COM SLASH passionstruck.

Vinted

Ready to clean out your closet and make some extra money? Download the Vinted app for free and start listing. With no seller fees, you keep every dollar you earn.

About Today’s Guest, Alexis Redding

Dr. Alexis Redding is a developmental psychologist and higher education researcher at the Harvard Graduate School of Education, where her work focuses on college student development, mental health, identity, and the transition to adulthood. She co-leads the Transition to Adulthood Lab and directs professional development work focused on mental health in higher education. Her research examines how young people navigate the formative years of college and how institutions can create environments that support their well-being and development.

A distinctive part of Alexis’s work involves recovering and studying archival interviews with college students from the 1970s, allowing researchers to compare the experiences of earlier generations with those of young people today. Her findings highlight the persistence of uncertainty, loneliness, identity development, and the need for belonging across generations. She is the author of The End of Adolescence: The Lost Art of Delaying Adulthood and editor of Mental Health in College: What Research Tells Us About Supporting Students, works that examine how young people grow, change, and find their way through the transition into adult life.

What Do 1970s College Students Reveal About MENTAL HEALTH Today?

Learn More and Connect

👉 All episode links, my books You Matter, Luma, and The Mattering Effect, The Ignited Life newsletter, and the Start Mattering store are here: linktr.ee/John_R_Miles

FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions)

What is mental health in college?

Mental health in college refers to students’ psychological and emotional well-being as they navigate academic demands, relationships, identity development, independence, and the transition into adulthood. It is influenced by individual circumstances as well as the social and institutional environments in which students live and learn.

Why is belonging important for college student mental health?

Belonging helps students feel accepted and connected to their community. Research discussed by Dr. Alexis Redding links a sense of belonging with positive outcomes such as academic performance, help-seeking, persistence, and graduation. Feeling recognized and supported can also make it easier for students to ask questions, take risks, and recover from setbacks.

What did Alexis Redding discover in the 1970s student interviews?

Alexis Redding helped recover an archive of college student interviews and related documents that had been abandoned in 1979. The recordings revealed that students from earlier generations described experiences familiar to young adults today, including loneliness, uncertainty, identity questions, family expectations, and concerns about the future.

What is effortless perfection among college students?

Effortless perfection describes pressure to appear successful and capable without showing the struggle behind that success. This expectation can make students reluctant to admit uncertainty or ask for help, especially when they believe their peers are managing college more easily than they are.

How can colleges better support student mental health?

Colleges can support student mental health by combining appropriate services with a broader culture of care. This includes helping students establish connections, making help-seeking feel acceptable, recognizing individual students, and creating environments where uncertainty and mistakes can be part of learning rather than sources of shame.

Why is the transition to adulthood so challenging?

The transition to adulthood often involves changes in identity, relationships, education, work, and responsibility at the same time. Young adults may be expected to make consequential decisions while they are still learning about their interests, values, and abilities. Supportive relationships and opportunities to explore can help them navigate that uncertainty.

What does Mental Health in College explore?

Mental Health in College: What Research Tells Us About Supporting Students examines research on college student mental health and the role that higher education institutions can play in supporting student well-being. It addresses the varied pressures students encounter and encourages approaches that build supportive, caring, and inclusive campus communities.

Why are career changes and reinvention important in adulthood?

Career changes can reflect the way people’s interests, priorities, and circumstances evolve over time. Learning to reconsider a plan, respond to new experiences, and pursue a different direction helps people navigate uncertainty throughout adulthood. As Alexis’s research illustrates, graduation is one milestone in development rather than the final answer to who a person will become.

These systems taught me to pay close attention to where I stood relative to everyone else, and over time, I began to understand how easily that habit can shape the way we see ourselves. In this episode of Passion Struck, I explore how to stop measuring your worth through external rankings, professional achievements, and other people’s expectations, and how to reclaim the agency to decide what those measurements mean.

Drawing on conversations with organizational psychologist Dr. Nir Halevy, self-compassion researcher Dr. Kristin Neff, and author Heather Monahan, I examine the connection between external validation and self-worth, the consequences of unhealthy competition at work, and the role of self-compassion in building a healthier relationship with ourselves.

The Trap of the External Scorecard

Recently, my book, The Mattering Effect, reached the USA Today bestseller list. I felt grateful for the people who had supported the book, excited about the milestone, and deeply appreciative of what we had accomplished together. Then, almost immediately, I caught myself wondering where it would rank the following week. I had written a book about the systems that teach us to measure our worth through what we produce, yet my instinct was to look for another number to tell me how I should feel.

That moment reminded me how deeply the habit of comparison can become embedded in our thinking. A ranking can begin as a useful piece of information and gradually become a reference point for our identity. We start looking at the numbers around us to determine whether we are progressing quickly enough, earning enough recognition, or achieving enough to justify our place in the room.

In The Little Prince, Antoine de Saint-Exupéry describes how adults often try to understand a person through figures such as age, income, and family background, overlooking the questions that reveal what makes someone distinctive. Today, those figures have multiplied. We have performance tiers, sales leaderboards, follower counts, class rankings, and ratings attached to our names. Each offers a way to compare ourselves with others, but none can capture the full substance of a human life.

My conversation with Dr. Nir Halevy helped me understand why these systems have such a powerful influence. Hierarchies are a feature of many human environments, from workplaces and schools to families and institutions. Their effects depend partly on how they are designed. When a hierarchy creates opportunities for people to contribute in different ways, it can help organize collective effort. When it rewards only a narrow definition of success, it can encourage people to compete for recognition at the expense of trust, cooperation, and belonging.

The consequences become especially visible in environments built around forced rankings, where a small difference in performance can carry enormous implications. People may begin withholding information, avoiding collaboration, or disengaging when they believe their efforts cannot change their position. The organization may still be measuring performance, but the system is also teaching people how to treat one another.

I have seen these dynamics from the inside, including in corporate environments where a low ranking could put someone’s job at risk. My own experience taught me that measurement can be useful when it helps us understand our work and improve our decisions. The trouble begins when we allow a measure of activity to become a judgment about our worth. Learning how to stop measuring your worth by other people’s scorecards begins with recognizing that distinction.

When the Critic Moves In: The Cost of Conditional Worth

The external scorecard becomes particularly powerful when we begin carrying it inside our own minds. In my conversation with Dr. Kristin Neff, she explained how conditioning, cultural expectations, and our responses to perceived threats can contribute to the harsh way many of us speak to ourselves. When we believe we have fallen short, we may turn the same defensive instincts we use against an outside threat inward, criticizing ourselves in the hope that punishment will prevent future failure.

That response can feel productive because it resembles discipline. We tell ourselves that being harder on ourselves will make us more capable, that self-criticism will keep us from becoming complacent, and that kindness toward ourselves might somehow reduce our ambition. Over time, however, this way of relating to ourselves can make our sense of worth increasingly dependent on meeting conditions that keep changing. The right grades lead to the right school, the right school to the right job, and the right job to another expectation we must satisfy.

Kristin helped me see the importance of distinguishing self-esteem from self-compassion. Self-esteem involves evaluating ourselves, while self-compassion means being there for ourselves when we are hurting. That distinction matters because even a person who is capable, accomplished, and respected will encounter disappointment, mistakes, and uncertainty. If our ability to care for ourselves depends on performing well, difficult moments can leave us feeling as though we have lost our place in our own lives.

I recognized this pattern in what I call the slow fade. For years, I could be effective in a boardroom, engaged in conversation with friends, and present in my family life while gradually feeling less connected to the person I was beneath those roles. The more I presented the version of myself I believed each room expected, the more the real me seemed to retreat. Eventually, I began to feel invisible to myself.

That experience changed how I think about burnout. We often discuss exhaustion in terms of workload, responsibility, and the demands placed on us by other people. Those factors matter, but there is another source of depletion that deserves attention: the effort required to keep proving that we deserve our place. When our identity becomes tied to constant performance, rest can feel undeserved, mistakes can feel threatening, and even meaningful achievements can offer only temporary relief.

Kristin’s work points toward a more sustainable way of responding. Self-compassion creates room to acknowledge difficulty without adding another layer of judgment. It allows us to examine what happened, learn from it, and choose a response without treating the experience as evidence that we are fundamentally inadequate. As she reminded me, we aren’t computers. Our ability to exercise agency depends partly on having the emotional safety to think clearly, respond thoughtfully, and include ourselves in the care we extend to others.

In this episode, You’ll Learn:

• Why external rankings, performance metrics, and social comparisons can turn achievement into a source of conditional self-worth.
• How broken hierarchies and unhealthy competition at work can weaken trust, collaboration, and belonging.
• What Dr. Kristin Neff’s research reveals about self-compassion, the inner critic, and the emotional conditions that support agency.
• How to recognize the difference between useful performance feedback and a judgment about your identity.
• How Heather Monahan’s experience illustrates the relationship between confidence, perception, and the environments we inhabit.
• How to use The Blueprint Check to examine a room, challenge the beliefs it reinforces, and choose one practical step toward reclaiming your agency.

The Blueprint Check: Three Questions to Reclaim Your Agency

Once I began connecting the systems that rank us with the inner critic that learns to keep score, I wanted a practical way to help people recognize those influences in everyday life. My conversations with Nir, Kristin, and Heather Monahan led me to develop what I call The Blueprint Check, a three-question exercise for examining the environments we inhabit and deciding how we want to respond to them.

The first question is: Who designed this room? Every environment has a set of priorities, whether those priorities are explicitly stated or quietly reinforced through everyday behavior. A workplace might reward individual output while talking about teamwork. A family might value achievement so strongly that vulnerability becomes difficult to express. A social media feed might reward visibility and popularity until the number of reactions begins to influence how we evaluate our lives. Asking who designed the room helps us look beyond our immediate feelings and examine the incentives shaping our behavior. It also invites us to consider whether the system brings people closer together or pulls them apart.

The second question is: What is it teaching me about my worth? This is where I examine the beliefs I may have absorbed from the environment. When a colleague receives recognition, do I interpret their success as evidence that I am falling behind? When a project disappoints, do I treat the result as useful feedback or as a judgment about my ability and character? The goal is to separate what a measurement can reasonably tell me from the meaning I have attached to it. This question also gives me an opportunity to respond to myself with the same patience I might offer a friend who was struggling with a similar experience.

The third question is: What’s my move? Once I understand the environment and recognize the beliefs it is reinforcing, I can begin considering my options. Sometimes I can change how I respond to a situation. Sometimes I can challenge a system, ask for different measures of contribution, or help create a more collaborative environment. In other circumstances, I may need to acknowledge that the environment itself is unhealthy and begin looking for a place where I can contribute more fully.

Heather’s experience returning to Worcester Academy, the school she attended as a scholarship and work-study student, illustrates how our perception of a room can change over time. She remembered feeling small among classmates whose wealth made her question whether she belonged. Returning years later, after building a successful career, she recognized how much she had been shrinking herself in response to that environment. Her story reminded me that our interpretation of a room can influence our experience of it, while Nir’s research reminds me that genuinely broken hierarchies and injustice also exist. Agency requires us to understand both realities. We can examine the beliefs we carry while remaining honest about the conditions around us.

The Blueprint Check gives me a way to move from awareness to choice. It helps me recognize that I may not have designed the systems I inhabit, yet I can still decide which measurements deserve my attention, which beliefs need to be questioned, and what action is available to me now.

Together, these six signals provide a practical way to examine the conditions shaping our sense of mattering and begin rebuilding the foundation beneath it.

The Figures vs. What Actually Matters

The questions I return to most often are the ones that take me beyond comparison. What do I contribute? What do I care about? What kind of person am I becoming through the choices I make? These questions require a different kind of attention from the questions asked by a leaderboard. They ask me to consider the quality of my relationships, the meaning of my work, and whether the way I spend my time reflects the things I say matter to me.

This distinction sits at the heart of The Mattering Effect, my book about how the systems around us shape our sense of worth and our experience of mattering. I wrote it because I believe our environments influence whether we feel seen, valued, and able to contribute. The scorecards we encounter are part of that larger story. When an environment recognizes only a narrow set of achievements, people can begin to question whether the qualities that make them human have any place in the room.

The ideas in this episode connect directly with three conversations that helped shape my thinking. In Episode 833, Dr. Kristin Neff explored self-compassion and the importance of treating ourselves with care when we struggle. In Episode 835, Dr. Nir Halevy examined how organizational hierarchies and competitive systems influence behavior. In Episode 836, Heather Monahan discussed confidence, the stories we tell ourselves about where we belong, and the possibility of changing our circumstances when an environment diminishes us. Together, their insights helped me understand that mattering is shaped by the interaction between our internal beliefs, the environments we inhabit, and the opportunities we have to contribute.

For me, the deeper question is how to build a life in which achievement serves something meaningful rather than becoming the sole measure of identity. Ambition can be valuable. Feedback can help us improve. Recognition can acknowledge effort and contribution. These things become more useful when they exist within a broader understanding of what makes a life worthwhile. A ranking might tell me how one result compares with another, but it cannot tell me whether I am living with integrity, whether I am showing up for the people I love, or whether my work is helping create something that matters.

That is why I return to the questions in The Little Prince. What does someone love? What makes them curious? What do they bring to the people around them? Asking these questions changes the way I see others, and it changes the way I see myself. It allows me to recognize forms of value that do not always appear in a report, a review, or a public ranking. If The Mattering Effect has a central connection to this conversation, it is that our environments should help people recognize and express their contributions, while our measures of success should leave room for the full complexity of a human life.

The Mattering Effect by John R. Miles as a Must Read by the Next Big Idea Book Club (image)

How to Apply the Blueprint Check in Everyday Life

I recommend beginning with one room that has a noticeable influence on how you feel about yourself. It might be a workplace where performance rankings dominate the conversation, a family dynamic in which achievement receives the most attention, a relationship that leaves you questioning your value, or a social media feed that encourages constant comparison. Choose an environment you encounter regularly, because the goal is to notice a pattern you can begin responding to more intentionally.

Start by asking what the environment measures and rewards. Look at the behaviors that receive recognition, the contributions that go unnoticed, and the ways people respond when someone succeeds. If a team claims to value collaboration but rewards only individual rankings, pay attention to the tension between its stated values and its incentives. Understanding that design can help you distinguish between a personal shortcoming and a problem created by the environment.

Next, notice the meaning you attach to what happens there. If your performance falls short of your expectations, write down what the evidence actually tells you. Perhaps a project needs improvement, a skill requires practice, or a conversation needs to happen. Those are useful conclusions because they point toward specific actions. If the same result leads you to believe you are inadequate or do not belong, pause and consider whether you have turned information into a verdict about your worth.

Then decide what is within your influence. You might ask your manager for clearer feedback, suggest a measure that recognizes team contributions, share a useful insight with a colleague, or stop checking a social metric that repeatedly pulls you into comparison. If the environment is persistently harmful and there is little willingness to change it, you can begin exploring alternatives rather than assuming you must endure it indefinitely. Agency can involve changing your behavior, changing the conditions around you, or preparing to leave.

Finally, choose one small action you can take today. A practical first step could be acknowledging a colleague’s achievement without comparing it with your own, asking for feedback that helps you improve rather than simply ranking your performance, or setting aside time to reflect on what you value beyond professional recognition. When your inner voice becomes especially harsh, try the phrase Kristin shared in our conversation: “I will not abandon you.” Let it remind you that you can take responsibility for your actions while still treating yourself with care.

I do not expect one exercise to resolve every difficult relationship or repair every broken system. The value of The Blueprint Check is that it creates a moment between the pressure you experience and the response you choose. With practice, that moment can help you see the room more clearly, understand what its scorecards are teaching you, and make a decision that better reflects the person you want to be.

You will spend your life in environments that measure something. Some will help you grow, while others may encourage you to define yourself too narrowly. You can learn from those measurements without allowing them to become the final authority on your identity. A scorecard can measure what you did. It can’t measure what you’re worth.

Enjoy the Show? Listen to Episode 837

If you’ve ever wondered, “How do I stop measuring my worth by other people’s scorecards?”, Episode 837 explores how external validation, workplace rankings, and constant comparison can shape the way we see ourselves. I share a personal realization that followed the success of The Mattering Effect: even after the book landed on the USA Today bestseller list, my first instinct was to wonder where it would rank the following week. That moment reminded me how easily we can allow external measures of success to determine how we feel about ourselves, even when we have every reason to celebrate.

In this episode, I draw on conversations with Dr. Nir Halevy, Dr. Kristin Neff, and Heather Monahan to explore the psychology of unhealthy competition, the difference between self-esteem and self-compassion, and how the environments we inhabit can either strengthen our sense of agency or leave us feeling diminished. I also introduce the Blueprint Check, a practical three-question framework to help you examine who designed the environments you’re in, what they are teaching you about your worth, and what you can do to change your relationship with them. Because a scorecard can measure what you did, but it cannot measure what you’re worth.

Listen to Episode 837 of Passion Struck with me on Spotify, or watch the full episode on our YouTube Channel.

For weekly companion essays, practical toolkits, and interactive reflections, join our community at The Ignited Life on Substack.

SPONSORED DEALS

FODZYME: We’re so excited to partner with FODZYME and offer you 30% off your first order when you go to I Can Eat Again dot com slash PASSIONSTRUCK.

Shopify: Sign up for your one-dollar-per-month trial today at SHOPIFY DOT COM SLASH passionstruck.

About the Author

I’m the author of Passion Struck, winner of the Gold Stevie® Award for Best Business Book and a Next Big Idea Club Must-Read, and the host of the Passion Struck podcast, with more than 85 million downloads.

As a former Fortune 50 executive and U.S. Navy officer, I’ve spent more than two decades synthesizing insights from psychology, neuroscience, behavioral science, leadership, and human flourishing to understand why so many people quietly lose their sense of significance despite outward success.

My work has been featured in Fortune, Inc., Forbes, ABC, NBC, Fox, and Writer’s Digest, and I’ve appeared on leading podcasts including 10% Happier with Dan Harris, The Next Big Idea Daily, and FranklinCovey On Leadership.

The Dangerous Way We Learn to Measure OUR Worth | John R. Miles explains

Frequently Asked Questions

How do you stop measuring your worth by other people’s opinions?

Start by recognizing when you have turned an external measurement into a personal verdict. Rankings, performance reviews, follower counts, and other people’s achievements can provide information, but they cannot determine your inherent worth. I use the Blueprint Check to examine who designed the environment, what it is teaching me about my value, and what action I can take to reclaim my agency.

Why do we compare ourselves to others?

Comparison often grows out of environments that organize people into hierarchies and reward them for outperforming one another. These systems can make us increasingly attentive to where we stand relative to others, sometimes at the expense of collaboration, connection, and our own sense of purpose. As Dr. Nir Halevy explains, hierarchy itself is not necessarily harmful. The problem emerges when competition becomes unhealthy and rankings begin to shape how people treat one another and themselves.

What is the difference between self-esteem and self-compassion?

Self-esteem involves evaluating how we feel about ourselves, often based on perceived strengths, achievements, or performance. Self-compassion is about responding to ourselves with care when we struggle, make mistakes, or experience pain. Drawing on Dr. Kristin Neff’s work, I explore why self-compassion matters when our inner critic turns disappointment into a judgment about who we are.

How does unhealthy competition at work affect self-worth?

Unhealthy competition at work can make employees feel that their value depends on their ranking, productivity, or ability to outperform colleagues. When organizations rely on rigid performance tiers or public leaderboards, people may become more protective of information, less willing to collaborate, and increasingly anxious about their standing. Over time, an external scorecard can become an internal one, leaving people measuring their identity through professional outcomes rather than the broader contributions that make their work meaningful.

What is the Blueprint Check?

The Blueprint Check is a three-question framework for examining the environments that influence how we measure ourselves. First, ask who designed the room and what it rewards. Second, ask what the environment is teaching you about your worth and whether you have mistaken a measurement for a verdict. Third, ask what your next move could be, whether that means changing your behavior, seeing the situation differently, or leaving an environment that consistently diminishes you.

Can you build self-compassion at work without lowering your standards?

Yes. Self-compassion allows you to acknowledge disappointment, learn from mistakes, and pursue improvement without treating every setback as evidence that you are inadequate. You can take your responsibilities seriously while remembering that your performance on a particular day does not define your entire worth. The goal is to approach challenges with enough emotional safety to learn, adapt, and keep moving forward.

How can you reclaim your agency when an environment makes you feel inadequate?

Reclaiming agency begins with recognizing that an environment may influence your choices without having the final word on your identity. You can examine the rules you are operating under, decide which ones deserve your participation, and identify one small action within your control. As I explain in this episode, agency is not blame. You may not have designed the system, but you can begin questioning the meaning you attach to its judgments and exploring how to respond differently.

How does The Mattering Effect relate to measuring your worth?

In The Mattering Effect, I explore the importance of recognizing that our lives have significance beyond external measures of achievement. This episode examines one of the ways we lose sight of that truth: allowing rankings, recognition, and comparison to become substitutes for a deeper sense of mattering. Learning to distinguish what a scorecard measures from what makes a person valuable is part of building a more intentional life.

In this episode of Passion Struck, I sit down with Heather Monahan, entrepreneur, keynote speaker, and bestselling author of Confidence Creator and Overcome Your Villains. After building an impressive career in media and rising to the C-suite as a chief revenue officer, Heather experienced an unexpected firing that forced her to reconsider her identity, her professional future, and what she wanted from the next chapter of her life. Her story offers a valuable perspective on career resilience because it reveals how the experiences that unsettle our confidence can also help us discover the beliefs and habits that have been limiting us.

Our conversation explores the relationship between confidence, environment, personal agency, and the courage to act before we feel entirely ready. Heather shares how she learned to recognize toxic workplace dynamics, why she believes you should never take a no from someone who cannot give you a yes, and how small actions can gradually change the way you see yourself. Her experiences invite us to examine a deeper question: how much of our perceived potential reflects our actual abilities, and how much has been shaped by the people, situations, and stories we have learned to accept?

Why Successful People Still Struggle With Self-Doubt

One of the most revealing aspects of confidence is that achievement does not necessarily eliminate insecurity. Heather describes how she struggled with self-doubt and imposter syndrome early in life, particularly while attending a prestigious school on a scholarship. Surrounded by students from wealthier backgrounds, she carried a persistent concern that she needed to prove she was worthy of being there. She responded by pushing herself to excel in sports, leadership, and speaking, hoping that performance would provide the reassurance she could not yet find within herself.

Years later, returning to that same school with her son gave Heather an unexpected opportunity to reconsider those memories. Having traveled internationally and built a successful career, she saw the environment through a different lens. The school seemed smaller, and the insecurity she had once associated with it became easier to understand. She recognized that her younger self had interpreted the setting through shame and self-doubt, creating an internal experience that was far more intimidating than the place itself.

This realization offers an important lesson about overcoming imposter syndrome. Our perceptions are shaped by the meaning we attach to our experiences, and those interpretations can remain influential long after the original circumstances have changed. We may continue to approach a new opportunity as though we are still the inexperienced person who once struggled to belong. Rebuilding confidence requires us to recognize when an old narrative is influencing a present decision and to consider whether our current abilities, experiences, and circumstances support that narrative.

Self-belief develops as we accumulate evidence that challenges the assumptions we have carried about ourselves. Each difficult conversation we handle, responsibility we accept, or unfamiliar situation we navigate can help us develop a more accurate understanding of our capabilities. The goal is to build a relationship with ourselves that can accommodate uncertainty while still allowing us to move forward.

How Your Environment Shapes Your Confidence

Confidence is often treated as an individual quality, something we either possess or need to develop through greater discipline. Heather’s experiences reveal another dimension: the environments we inhabit can either reinforce our strengths or make it increasingly difficult to access them. The people around us influence what we consider possible, how we interpret setbacks, and whether we feel encouraged to pursue growth.

Heather illustrates this idea through a comparison between running alone and running alongside accomplished athletes in Miami, where she lives. When she runs alone, distractions can make it tempting to abandon a goal before completing it. When she joins the larger community of runners around her, their persistence changes the experience. Even when the weather becomes difficult, seeing other people continue encourages her to do the same. Their example makes sustained effort feel more natural and creates a shared standard that helps her remain committed.

The same dynamic can operate in professional life. Colleagues who challenge our thinking, recognize our contributions, and encourage us to take on greater responsibility can expand our sense of what we are capable of accomplishing. By contrast, an environment characterized by exclusion, disrespect, or constant uncertainty can gradually narrow our ambitions. Over time, we may begin to confuse our diminished confidence with diminished ability, even when the underlying problem is the environment in which we are trying to perform.

This distinction matters because resilience is not simply a matter of enduring difficult circumstances indefinitely. Persistence is valuable when it helps us work toward something meaningful, but it becomes costly when we use it to justify remaining in situations that consistently undermine our well-being or potential. Sometimes the most productive way to strengthen confidence is to seek relationships and environments that allow our abilities to develop.

In this episode, you’ll learn

• Why self-doubt can persist even when you have the skills and experience to succeed, and how to recognize the assumptions that keep you playing small.
• How your environment influences confidence, ambition, and the standards you set for yourself.
• Why you should never take a no from someone who cannot give you a yes, and how Heather learned to advocate for her own value.
• How toxic workplace dynamics can gradually undermine your confidence, and why ignoring harmful behavior can make the situation worse.
• How to build confidence through small, uncomfortable actions that help you develop evidence of your own capabilities.
• How journaling, personal boundaries, and a willingness to change your circumstances can help you reclaim your agency and move toward a more fulfilling life.

What to Do When a Toxic Workplace Undermines Your Worth

Heather’s career provides a particularly instructive example of how toxic workplace dynamics can develop gradually. During her time in a senior media role, she describes experiencing exclusion and disrespect from a powerful colleague. Meetings were arranged without her, her contributions were disregarded, and professional opportunities became entangled in interpersonal conflict. Heather initially concentrated on delivering results and hoped that strong performance would eventually make the situation manageable.

Over time, however, the consequences became difficult to ignore. She describes losing sleep and experiencing physical signs of stress while continuing to work in an environment that had become increasingly unhealthy. The experience helped her recognize a pattern that many high performers encounter: when someone takes pride in their ability to deliver results, they may respond to mistreatment by working harder, believing that exceptional performance will eventually resolve a problem rooted in relationships and power.

Heather expresses the lesson directly: “The problem is bad behaviour doesn’t go away when you ignore it; you amplify it.” In her experience, remaining silent allowed the behavior to continue and influenced how others treated her. The longer she tolerated the situation, the more difficult it became to maintain the confident, capable version of herself she knew she could be.

This insight is especially important for people who have built their identity around being dependable, adaptable, or easy to work with. Those qualities can become liabilities when they lead us to absorb every inconvenience and avoid every difficult conversation. Professional maturity includes the ability to distinguish between the ordinary friction of collaboration and a recurring pattern of behavior that undermines respect, accountability, or psychological safety.

Heather eventually created a deliberate plan to rebuild her confidence. She revisited an image of herself at a time when she felt particularly strong, established daily actions, and developed a playlist to help prepare herself before difficult meetings. These steps helped her reconnect with her own sense of identity and begin responding to the situation differently. Her experience demonstrates that rebuilding confidence often requires both internal work and external decisions. Personal practices can help us regain clarity, while boundaries and changes to our circumstances determine whether that clarity can be sustained.

Why You Should Never Take a No From Someone Who Can’t Give You a Yes

One of Heather’s most memorable career lessons emerged when she decided to advocate for a larger role within a broadcasting company. After delivering strong results, she approached the company president with a proposal to create a vice president of sales position overseeing the broader organization. He declined, explaining that she was doing excellent work in her existing role and that the company did not need the proposed change.

Heather took the response seriously, but she also trusted her assessment of her own value. Rather than accepting the rejection as a definitive judgment of her potential, she began exploring opportunities elsewhere. She identified a more substantial position with another broadcaster and decided to give her current employer one more opportunity to reconsider before she resigned.

When Heather raised the proposal again, the president initially repeated his refusal. She then told him she was resigning. He asked her to wait, stepped away to make a phone call, and returned with a different answer: the company wanted her to take the vice president of sales role. Heather later learned that he had needed approval from his father, who held the authority to make the decision.

The experience taught her a principle she continues to share: “Never take a no from someone who can’t give you a yes.”

The deeper lesson concerns the difference between rejection and authority. When someone declines a request, we often assume their response represents the final verdict on our abilities, our ideas, or the opportunities available to us. Yet that person may have limited decision-making power, incomplete information, or constraints that have little to do with our worth. Understanding who can actually make a decision allows us to respond strategically instead of interpreting every refusal as a personal judgment.

Heather’s story also highlights the importance of advocating for yourself with evidence and intention. She had demonstrated her value through results, identified a role that matched her capabilities, and communicated what she wanted directly. Her confidence did not guarantee that the outcome would go her way, but it allowed her to pursue an opportunity rather than remain dependent on someone else’s recognition.

This principle applies well beyond corporate leadership. Whether you are negotiating compensation, proposing a new project, pursuing a partnership, or asking for greater responsibility, it is worth understanding how decisions are made and who has the authority to make them. Sometimes progress requires a stronger proposal. Sometimes it requires a different conversation. And sometimes the most constructive response is to take your capabilities somewhere they can be recognized and put to better use.

The Confidence Lessons Behind Heather Monahan’s Books

When Heather Monahan reflects on her career, the story that emerges is shaped by several moments when the direction of her life changed before she could fully understand what those changes would mean. Early jobs taught her how to sell, follow through, and build relationships. Unexpected opportunities helped her discover that a disadvantage could become a source of distinction. Later, a difficult corporate experience challenged the confidence she had developed over decades and forced her to reconsider how much of her identity had become tied to professional achievement.

Those experiences provide the foundation for her books, Confidence Creator and Overcome Your Villains. In Confidence Creator, Heather explores how confidence develops through action, repetition, and the willingness to pursue opportunities before we feel entirely prepared. Her account of appearing on the Elvis Duran show captures this philosophy in a particularly human way. She made mistakes during an intimidating experience, but she also completed it, learned from it, and added another piece of evidence to the growing belief that she could handle difficult situations.

The lesson becomes more significant when we consider how confidence is often misunderstood. From the outside, an accomplished person may appear naturally assured, and their visible achievements can make the path toward those achievements seem almost effortless. Heather’s experience reveals the smaller decisions that rarely make it into a success story: the uncomfortable conversations, the nights of uncertainty, the willingness to try again, and the gradual process of learning to trust one’s judgment.

Overcome Your Villains extends this reflection to the internal narratives and external relationships that can keep people from becoming who they want to be. Heather’s experience with workplace toxicity helped her recognize how easily someone can normalize disrespect while concentrating on performance. Her eventual decision to examine her own responses and establish stronger boundaries gave her a way to reclaim her agency and reconsider which relationships deserved a place in her life.

Together, these books offer a connected perspective on personal growth. Confidence develops when we take meaningful action and learn from the result, while boundaries help protect the conditions that allow that confidence to grow. Both require a willingness to examine familiar patterns and make choices that may feel uncomfortable in the moment. Heather’s story is a reminder that a difficult chapter can become a source of insight when we use it to understand ourselves more clearly and make more intentional decisions about what comes next.

How to Build Confidence Through Small Actions

Heather’s approach to confidence begins with a deceptively simple idea: confidence grows through action. Many people wait until they feel prepared, assured, or free from anxiety before pursuing something important. That approach can create a frustrating cycle because confidence often develops through the very experiences we postpone until we feel confident enough to attempt them.

Heather describes confidence as something we are either creating or chipping away at in any given moment. The decisions we make around uncertainty gradually shape our expectations of ourselves. When we repeatedly avoid situations that matter to us, we may reinforce the belief that we are unable to handle them. When we take manageable steps into unfamiliar territory, we give ourselves opportunities to develop competence and gather evidence that we can cope with discomfort.

Her experience appearing on the Elvis Duran radio show illustrates this process. After leaving the media industry, Heather was rebuilding her career and facing a future that remained uncertain. The opportunity to appear on a major radio show was intimidating, and the experience did not unfold perfectly. Her phone vibrated during the broadcast, prompting a lighthearted moment in which she had to acknowledge the mistake. Yet she had shown up, navigated the experience, and completed something that had previously felt daunting. She recorded the experience as a win in her confidence-building journal.

That detail reveals an important shift in how we measure progress. If success means performing flawlessly, every mistake becomes evidence against us. If success also includes taking a meaningful step despite fear, then an imperfect experience can still strengthen our confidence. We learn that we can tolerate embarrassment, adjust to unexpected circumstances, and continue moving toward our goals without requiring every attempt to validate our abilities.

Heather recommends tracking these moments rather than allowing them to disappear from memory. A journal of difficult actions completed, problems handled, and experiences survived can help counter the tendency to remember failures more vividly than progress. Over time, these records provide a more balanced picture of our capabilities and make the next challenge easier to approach.

Building self-confidence through small actions is particularly valuable when a goal feels overwhelming. A person who wants to become a stronger public speaker might begin by contributing to a meeting, then presenting to a small group, and eventually addressing a larger audience. Someone considering a career change might start by contacting people in the field, researching opportunities, or developing a new skill. Each step creates information, experience, and momentum.

The objective is to develop a pattern of acting in alignment with what matters to us, even when uncertainty remains. Confidence becomes more durable when it is grounded in lived experience rather than dependent on reassurance or perfect outcomes.

SPONSORED DEALS

FODZYME

We’re so excited to partner with FODZYME and offer you 30% off your first order when you go to I Can Eat Again dot com slash PASSIONSTRUCK.

SHOPIFY

It’s time to turn those “What Ifs” into SFX: CHA-CHING with Shopify today. Sign up for your one-dollar-per-month trial today at SHOPIFY DOT COM SLASH passionstruck.

Vinted

Ready to clean out your closet and make some extra money? Download the Vinted app for free and start listing. With no seller fees, you keep every dollar you earn.

About Today’s Guest, Heather Monahan

Heather Monahan is an entrepreneur, keynote speaker, and bestselling author known for her work on confidence, leadership, and overcoming professional and personal obstacles. Her career in media culminated in a chief revenue officer role, following years of experience in sales, revenue generation, and business leadership. After an unexpected firing forced her to rethink her professional future, she rebuilt her career and developed a broader platform focused on helping people recognize their value, strengthen their confidence, and navigate difficult environments.

She is the author of Confidence Creator and Overcome Your Villains, books that explore the relationship between self-belief, deliberate action, personal boundaries, and the courage to create a new path. Through her speaking, writing, and entrepreneurial work, Heather shares practical lessons drawn from her own experiences with career setbacks, resilience, and personal reinvention.

Why Should You Never Take a No From Someone Who Can’t Say YES? | Heather Monahan

Learn More and Connect

👉 All episode links, my books You Matter, Luma, and The Mattering Effect, The Ignited Life newsletter, and the Start Mattering store are here: linktr.ee/John_R_Miles

FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions)

How to build confidence when you feel insecure?

Confidence can grow through small, deliberate actions that help you develop experience and trust in your own abilities. Start with a manageable challenge, such as speaking up in a meeting, asking a direct question, or pursuing an opportunity you have been postponing. Record what you learn from each experience so that your understanding of yourself reflects actual progress rather than only your fears.

Can a toxic work environment damage your confidence?

A persistently unhealthy work environment can undermine confidence by exposing someone to exclusion, disrespect, inconsistent expectations, or repeated challenges to their credibility. Over time, these experiences may influence how a person evaluates their abilities and approaches new opportunities. Recognizing the pattern, seeking appropriate support, and establishing boundaries can help clarify what needs to change.

How do you know when it is time to leave a job?

It may be time to consider leaving when a workplace consistently harms your well-being, limits your development, or requires you to tolerate disrespect without a realistic path toward improvement. Before making a decision, assess your financial and professional circumstances, explore available alternatives, and consider whether a conversation or internal change could resolve the problem. The important step is to recognize that your current position is one part of your career, not a complete definition of your future.

What are some small daily habits that build self-confidence?

Useful habits include setting achievable goals, following through on commitments to yourself, recording moments of progress, asking for feedback, and practicing conversations that you would otherwise avoid. These actions help you develop evidence that you can learn and respond effectively to challenges. Over time, repeated experiences can make difficult situations feel more manageable.

How can journaling help you overcome self-doubt?

Journaling creates space to examine the beliefs and interpretations that influence your behavior. You can use it to identify recurring fears, distinguish facts from assumptions, record successful experiences, and reflect on relationships that affect your confidence. This process can make patterns easier to recognize and help you decide which actions or boundaries would support meaningful change.

Why should you never take a no from someone who can’t give you a yes?

Heather Monahan learned this lesson when a company president initially rejected her proposal for a larger role, only for the decision to change after he consulted the person with final authority. The experience showed her why it is important to understand who can actually make a decision. A refusal may reflect limited authority or organizational constraints rather than a final judgment of your potential, so identifying the appropriate decision-maker can help you advocate for yourself more effectively.