There is a particular kind of uncertainty that comes from realizing the mental map you have relied on for years may no longer describe the world around you. In this conversation, I explore how to become more adaptable with Alec Litowitz, whose thinking begins with a deceptively simple idea: adaptability is not merely another trait to add to our intellectual toolkit. It is the capacity to recognize when the framework itself needs to change. Alec describes growing up in an environment where curiosity mattered more than having the final answer, telling me, “I was not rewarded for having the right answer. I was rewarded for having another and a better question.”
That orientation became a thread through his education and career. Alec studied mathematics, anthropology, law, and business because he was interested in the structures beneath each discipline and the different rules governing nature, culture, institutions, and human interaction. His education taught him to look at problems from multiple angles rather than assuming that one framework could explain everything.
That distinction becomes especially important when the environment itself changes. A person can have tremendous intelligence, emotional intelligence, discipline, and determination, yet still apply those strengths within the wrong frame. Alec captures the danger through an analogy from his years competing in Ironman races: you can be swimming quickly alongside a group of people and still discover that everyone is moving rapidly in the wrong direction. Adaptability is the capacity to lift your head, examine the course, and ask whether your effort is actually aligned with reality.
Why Adaptability Became the Meta Skill
Alec’s argument for adaptability begins with a distinction between navigating a known environment and recognizing when the environment has changed. IQ and EQ can help us operate effectively within a particular framework, but they do not necessarily tell us whether the framework itself remains useful. His concept of the Adaptability Quotient, or AQ, addresses that higher-order question: Are you applying your abilities in a direction that still corresponds with the world as it is?
This is why Alec describes adaptability as the “meta skill.” A person may possess grit and intelligence and know how to collaborate exceptionally well, but those abilities still need somewhere productive to point. When conditions shift, the more important question becomes whether the assumptions underneath our decisions remain valid.
The Blockbuster and Netflix example makes the distinction tangible. Blockbuster could continue improving its existing model, becoming more efficient at operating physical stores and serving customers within that structure. Netflix recognized that the relevant frame had changed. The lesson is not simply that one company adapted faster than another. It is that execution becomes increasingly irrelevant when the underlying model of reality has shifted. As Alec puts it, “Adaptability is what says you’re touching true reality as it is right now.”
This applies far beyond business. Careers change. Technologies alter the skills that matter. Institutions evolve. Relationships enter new seasons. Even our understanding of ourselves develops as we gather experience. Becoming more adaptable therefore requires a willingness to distinguish between what deserves persistence and what deserves revision.
AI and the Second Cognitive Revolution
The conversation takes an even more consequential turn when Alec describes artificial intelligence as part of what he calls the second cognitive revolution. His concern is not simply whether AI can perform particular tasks better or faster. The deeper question is what happens when a technology becomes part of the environment in which human beings think.
Alec argues that AI differs from ordinary tools because it can participate in cognition itself. Rather than simply helping us execute a task, it can interpret a question, compress information, generate possibilities, and present an answer that may feel more complete than our own thinking. “It changes the water in which you swim and think,” he says. “That is more than a tool.”
That creates a subtle tension between augmentation and agency. Technology can expand what we are capable of doing, but it can also encourage us to surrender portions of the thinking process itself. Alec describes the danger through a remarkably candid observation: “I think I’m thinking, but I’m not really. I’m offloading it, and I’m getting a thin version back.”
For me, this is one of the most important ideas in the conversation because it reframes the question surrounding AI. The challenge is not simply learning how to use increasingly powerful tools. It is learning how to use them while preserving the human capacities that give those tools direction. Alec sees his book as a “repair kit for agency,” a framework designed to help people make decisions in an environment where the technology itself is changing how decisions are made.
In this episode, you’ll learn
- Why adaptability may matter more as environments change faster than our established mental models.
- How Alec Litowitz’s concept of the Adaptability Quotient helps us recognize when we are operating within the wrong frame.
- Why artificial intelligence represents a cognitive and environmental shift that can either expand or diminish human agency.
- How attaching your identity to an outcome can make it harder to update your beliefs when reality changes.
- Why feedback loops are essential for knowing when to persist, revise a strategy, or change environments.
- How to create stability through enduring values while allowing your mission, strategy, and decisions to evolve.
How Feedback Loops Tell You When to Change Course
Alec’s framework becomes especially practical when he turns to feedback loops. Adaptability is not simply a willingness to change. Without a way to determine what should change and when, constant change can become its own form of confusion. Feedback provides the information that allows an adaptive system to distinguish between persistence and revision.
Alec explains that an adaptive system is governed by feedback. When your actions produce information that helps you refine your understanding, the loop remains alive. When you receive no meaningful feedback, however, the absence itself can become information. Perhaps the strategy needs to change. Perhaps the mission has become disconnected from reality. Perhaps, as Alec points out, “sometimes you’re not getting feedback; you’re asking the wrong question.”
This is where the metaphor of finding the right “room” becomes useful. You can work extremely hard within an environment that simply does not fit the direction you need to go. Alec describes the adaptive process as learning when to leave that room while carrying your values and your capacity for adaptation with you. The goal is not to abandon everything whenever circumstances become difficult. It is to distinguish productive difficulty from evidence that the surrounding conditions have fundamentally changed.
This also creates a healthier relationship with failure. Instead of interpreting every unsuccessful outcome as a verdict on our identity, we can treat experience as information. The question becomes less about proving that we were right and more about understanding what reality is teaching us.
A Practical Framework for Making Adaptive Decisions
Alec’s book grew directly out of this concern with how people make decisions when the world is moving faster than their established mental models. In the conversation, he describes the book as a “how-to kit” for making adaptive decisions under uncertainty. Its purpose is deliberately different from giving readers a fixed collection of answers. Instead, Alec wants to provide a process that remains useful as the circumstances change.
There is an anecdote behind that philosophy that stayed with me. Alec explains that when he built Magnetar, he spent considerable time thinking about the values that would define the organization. He eventually identified integrity, insight, and passion as central values. His definition of integrity was especially revealing: how do you act when no one is looking? His definition of passion was equally connected to agency, because he sees passion as an internal drive rather than something that can simply be manufactured through external rewards.
That same distinction appears in his thinking about adaptability. Values can provide continuity while strategies remain flexible. Alec describes purpose as something rooted more deeply, mission as something that can move more slowly, and strategy as something that may need to change quickly when circumstances demand it. He compares mission to glass, which appears solid but moves incredibly slowly over long periods of time.
That is the central idea behind The Adaptability Quotient. Alec is trying to give readers a structure for deciding when to persist, when to explore, when to change course, and when to recognize that they are operating in the wrong environment. He describes the book as an “updating mechanism” rather than a prescription for one particular answer.
And perhaps the most human part of his argument comes at the end of our conversation. Alec believes adaptability is a capability people possess naturally and can exercise deliberately. “Humans can adapt in our lifetime,” he tells me. “It’s an incredible gift.” His hope is that we use that gift consciously as AI, social media, and other technologies reshape the environments in which we live and think.
When Your Identity Becomes Attached to an Answer
Adaptability becomes much harder when changing your mind feels like changing who you are. Alec connects the current experience of social and technological uncertainty to a deeper psychological need for stability. When people feel unmoored, they often look for something that can give them an immediate sense of belonging and certainty. In the modern environment, that stabilizer can become an identity attached to a group, an ideology, a community, or an answer.
The problem emerges when an answer that once provided stability becomes something we must defend regardless of what new information appears. Alec describes the distinction clearly: “If you have an identity stuck to an outcome, you will defend that answer. If you have an identity stuck to adaptability, you’ll update when the world changes.”
That idea changes the meaning of personal identity. Instead of defining ourselves entirely through a particular profession, worldview, achievement, role, or conclusion, we can develop a deeper identity around our capacity to learn and update. This does not require becoming endlessly uncertain about everything. It requires knowing which parts of ourselves should remain stable while allowing our interpretations and strategies to evolve.
In a period of rapid technological and cultural change, that distinction can become a source of psychological stability. We may not know exactly what the next environment will demand, but we can cultivate confidence in our ability to learn what it demands when we encounter it.
SPONSORED DEALS
FODZYME
We’re so excited to partner with FODZYME and offer you 30% off your first order when you go to I Can Eat Again dot com slash PASSIONSTRUCK.
SHOPIFY
It’s time to turn those “What Ifs” into SFX: CHA-CHING with Shopify today. Sign up for your one-dollar-per-month trial today at SHOPIFY DOT COM SLASH passionstruck.
Vinted
Ready to clean out your closet and make some extra money? Download the Vinted app for free and start listing. With no seller fees, you keep every dollar you earn.
About Today’s Guest, Alec Litowitz
Alec Litowitz is an investor, entrepreneur, and thinker whose career has been shaped by a sustained interest in how people make decisions under changing conditions. He founded Magnetar and later turned his attention toward the broader questions surrounding adaptability, agency, uncertainty, and the cognitive changes brought about by artificial intelligence. His multidisciplinary background includes mathematics, anthropology, law, and business, an unusual combination that reflects his longstanding fascination with the structures and rules underlying different systems.
In his work and writing, Alec explores what happens when the assumptions that once helped us navigate the world begin to lose their usefulness. His book, The Adaptability Quotient, develops a framework for making adaptive decisions in uncertain environments, with particular attention to feedback, identity, agency, and knowing when to change course. He describes the book as an effort to help people preserve their capacity for independent thought while navigating a period of accelerating technological and societal change.
How Can You Become More Adaptable in the Age of AI? | Alec Litowitz
Learn More and Connect
👉 All episode links, my books You Matter, Luma, and The Mattering Effect, The Ignited Life newsletter, and the Start Mattering store are here: linktr.ee/John_R_Miles
FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions)
What does it mean to become more adaptable?
Becoming more adaptable means developing the capacity to recognize when circumstances have changed and then update your assumptions, strategies, or decisions accordingly. Alec Litowitz frames adaptability as a higher-order capability that helps us determine where to direct other strengths such as intelligence, emotional intelligence, grit, and judgment.
What is the Adaptability Quotient?
The Adaptability Quotient, or AQ, is Alec Litowitz’s framework for thinking about our ability to recognize whether we are operating within the right frame as conditions change. In his explanation, AQ involves lifting your head from the immediate task and asking whether your effort is still aligned with the reality of the environment.
Why is adaptability important in the age of AI?
Alec argues that AI changes more than the tools available to us because it can become part of the environment in which we think. That creates an important question about agency: whether we are using AI to expand our cognitive range or gradually transferring parts of our thinking to it.
How does identity affect adaptability?
When identity becomes attached to a particular answer or outcome, changing that answer can feel personally threatening. Alec argues that identifying with adaptability creates a different relationship with uncertainty because updating your understanding becomes part of who you are rather than evidence that you were previously wrong.
How do feedback loops help with decision-making?
Feedback loops provide information about whether a strategy, mission, or environment is producing useful results. Alec emphasizes that when feedback disappears, the problem may be the strategy itself, the mission, or even the question being asked.
What should remain stable when everything else changes?
Alec places stability primarily in values and in the identity of being adaptable. Strategies can change quickly, missions can evolve more slowly, and circumstances can force us into entirely different environments. The enduring foundation is the set of values we carry with us and our ability to keep adapting to what comes next.
